← Library
Madras High CourtCRP(MD)/1883/2017dismissed as infructuous

Krishnan Suresh Kumar, v. R.Murugan,

2023-10-31Honourable Mr. Justice Battu Devanand11 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 31.10.2023

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND C.R.P(MD) No.1883 of 2017 and C.M.P(MD) Nos.9798 & 9799 of 2017 1.Krishnan Suresh Kumar 2.A. Muthumari @ Mallika 3.V. Ayyamperumal 4.A.Jeya

...Petitioners

Vs.

1.R. Murugan 2.R. Murugan 3.M. Balammal 4.Petchiammal 5.E. Koilammal 1/11

6.S. Rammamoorthy 7.Devika Ranjani

8. A. Subramanian 9.Geetha K. Somu (died ) 10.K. Usha Rani 11.K. Lakshmanan 12.Sridevi 13.V. Prakash babu 14.G. Thanagaraj 15.P. Pramma Thevan 16.Ramu Ammal 17.D. Christopher Jeyapaul 18.A. Durairaj 19.T. Maniraj 20.Jay Mary 21.N. Ponnammal @ santhi 22.C. Jeyaraj 2/11

23.R. Pon Selvli 24.P. Subasri 25.K. Usharani 26.K. Thiruvasagam 27.V. Muruganantham 28.P. Amma Ponnu 29.S. Anbu Selvi 30.Santhi Varma

31. Prithivi S. Ajish 32.C. Ramasundaram 33.Kalammal 34.T. Ramasamy 35.M. Chelladurai 36.Gomathi 37.Chandra 38.G. Prem Kumar 39.Gnanasundari 40.Jeyarani 3/11

41.R. Sangeetha 42.C. Varadharajan 43.Vimala 44.C. Santhankumar 45.N.Anandaraj, Narayanan 46.C. Perinba Roja 47.P. Chelladurai 48.Y.Chinnathai 49.S. Mohamed Rafeeq 50.M. Ansar Ali 51.S. Saravanan 52.Muthulakshmi 53.R. Murugan 54.N. Murugaiah 55.Reginal 56.P. Narayanan 57.S. Madasamy 58.Krishna Bama 4/11

59.J. Mumtaj 60.J. Sathikkul Ameen 61.M. Sornaraj 62.Margaret Rani 63.K. Krishnan 64.Mangayarkarasi 65.G. Ramasamy 66.M. Manickasamy 67.Poochendu 68.S. Michael 69.V. Jessaiaya 70.S. Sivanthi 71.Jeyalakshmi 72.Seethalakshmi 73.A. Subakumar 74.Tamizharasi 75.K. Kanagasabapathy 76.R. Simson Packiyaraja 5/11

77.R. Senthatti 78.A. Arunachalam Pillai 79.Valliammal 80.Selvi 81.A. Senthilveli 82.Shanmugathai 83.Valliammal 84.Petchiammal 85.Subbulakshmi 86.Dr. C. Babu 87.M.D.R. Renganathan 88.T.Maharajan

...Respondents

(Respondents in I.A./Defendants 1, 2, 5, 7, 8, 11, 13, 18, 19, 20, 22 to 24, 26 to 31, 33 to 35, 39 & 10, 42, 46, 48, 50, 57 to 62, 64 to 67, 70 to 76, 78 and 88 to 90 were called absent and set ex-parte in the trial Court and hence, notice to respondents 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 10, 12, 17 to 19, 21 to 23, 25 to 30, 32 to 34, 38, 39, 41, 45, 47, 49, 56 to 61, 63 to 66, 69 to 76, 86, 87 and 88 herein are not necessary and notice to them may be dispensed with) 6/11

PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 02.06.2017 made in I.A.No.980 of 2015 in O.S.No.168 of 2010 on the file of the Additional Subordinate Court, Tirunelveli and to allow the same by allowing the present Civil Revision Petition For Petitioners : Mr. S.P. Maharajan For Respondents : Mr.P.R. Boomeerajan - for R1 Mr.Ananth C.Rajesh - for RR4 & 68 Mr. M.S. Jawaharlal - for RR6, 9, 13, 36, 37, 40, 51, 52 & 54 Mr. S. Palanivelayutham - for RR42 to 44 No Appearance - for RR11, 14, 16, 20, 35, 46, 48, 50, 53, 62, 67, 77, 79 to 85.

Dispensed with - for RR2, 3, 5, 7, 8,10, 12, 17, 18, 19, 21, 22, 23, 25 to 30, 32 to 34 38, 39, 41, 45, 47, 49, 56 to 61, 63 to 66, 69 to 76 & 86 to 88.

7/11

Expired - RR15 & 78 Unserved - for RR24, 31, 61 & 55

O R D E R

This Civil Revision Petition is filed against the order 02.06.2017 passed in I.A.No.980 of 2015 in O.S.No.168 of 2010 on the file of the Additional Subordinate Court, Tirunelveli.

2. This Court called for the report from the concerned Principal District Judge, by order dated 19.10.2023 with regard to the status of the suit in the trial Court. Accordingly, the concerned Principal District Judge, has sent a report wherein, it is stated that the suit in O.S.No.168 of 2010 on the file of the Additional Subordinate Court, Tirunelveli, is dismissed for non-prosecution, by its decree and judgment, dated 04.11.2019.

3. In view of the above, as already the suit itself is dismissed for non-prosecution, in the considered opinion of this 8/11

Court, nothing survives for further adjudication in this Civil Revision Petition.

4. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. If the petitioners intend to ventilate their rights against the plaintiffs in O.S.No.168 of 2010, the petitioners are always at liberty to proceed in accordance with law.

5. No costs.

6. Consequently, connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

31.10.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No RM 9/11

To The Additional Subordinate Judge, Additional Subordinate Court, Tirunelveli.

10/11

BATTU DEVANAND, J.

RM C.R.P(MD) No.1883 of 2017 (1/2) 31.10.2023 11/11