Vignesh v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 14/11/2022 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice A.A.NAKKIRAN Vignesh, ... Petitioner/Accused Rank Not Known Vs State Rep.by The Inspector of Police, Koodakovil Police Station, Madurai District.

(Crime No.143/2022) ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : M/s.Arunraj K, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.143/2022 on the file of the Respondent Police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 427 and 506(ii) of I.P.C, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that due to previous motive, on 23.10.2022, at about 7.00 p.m., the petitioner along with four others came to the defacto complainant's house and scolded the defacto complainant by using filthy language, threatened him with dire consequences and also damaged the property worth about Rs.13,500/-. Hence, the present complaint.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner and the defacto complainant are very close relatives. 1/3

Due to previous motive, the defacto complainant filed this present false complaint against the petitioner and others. He would further submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he did not commit any offence as alleged by the prosecution. Hence, he may be granted anticipatory bail.

4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent police would submit that the accused persons have trespassed into the defacto complainant's house and abused him in filthy language, threatened him with dire consequences and also damaged the property worth about Rs.13,500/-. He would further submit that the petitioner is not having any previous case and the investigation in this case is still pending. Hence, he opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the nature of charges levelled against the petitioner and also the fact that the petitioner is not having any bad antecedents, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

6.Accordingly, the petitioner shall pay a sum of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand only) to the credit of Headmistress, Panchayat Union Primary School, Madurai East (Account No.10111536270, IFSC Code: SBIN0002246, State Bank of India, Othakadai Branch, Madurai), without prejudice to his rights and contentions before the trial Court and produce the receipt/acknowledgment before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam.

7.On production of such receipt/acknowledgment, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam,on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further conditions that: [a]the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhaar card or bank pass book to ensure their identity.

[b]the petitioner shall report before respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders;

[c]the petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

2/3

[d]the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[e]On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [f]If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

sd/- 14/11/2022 / TRUE COPY / /11/2022 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THIRUMANGALAM.

2 DO THROUGH:

THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI DISTRICT.

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KOODAKOVIL POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT.

THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

COPY TO THE HEADMISTRESS, PANCHAYAT UNION PRIMARY SCHOOL, MADURAI EAST.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.20139 of 2022 Date :14/11/2022 cp PKP/SSS/SAR /25.11.2022/3P/6C 3/3