← Library
Madras High CourtREV.APLC(MD)/86/2023dismissed

The Government Of Tamilnadu v. Arulchander

2023-11-22Honourable Mr Justice S.S. Sundar,Honourable Mr Justice D.Bharatha Chakravarthy4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 22.11.2023

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S. SUNDAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHI Rev. AplC(MD) No.86 of 2023 1.The Government of Tamil Nadu rep. By its Secretary, Finance (PGC) Department, Fort St. George, Chennai - 9.

2.The Government of Tamil Nadu rep. By its Secretary, School Education Department, Fort St. George, Chennai - 9.

3.The Director of Elementary Education, College Road, Chennai - 6.

4.The Chief Educational Officers, Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli District.

5.The District Elementary Educational Officer (now the District Education Officer), Tirunelveli District.

6.The Assistant Elementary Educational Officer (now Block Educational Officer), Vasudevanallur Range, Tirunelveli District.

... Applicants Vs.

1.Arulchander 2.The Secretary, Dharugapuram Elementary School, Vasudevanallur Range, Tirunelveli District.

1/4

3.The Secretary, AMC Primary School, Nelakattumsevai, Pacheri, Sivagiri Taluk, Tirunelveli District.

... Respondents Petition filed under Order 47 Rule 1 of C.P.C. read with Section 114 of C.P.C. praying to review the order dated 14.07.2023 made in W.A. (MD) No.1057 of 2023.

For Petitioners :

Mr.Sadiq Raja, Addl. Government Pleader

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by S.S.SUNDAR, J.) This review application is filed to review the judgment of this Bench dated 14.07.2023 in W.A.(MD) No.1057 of 2023.

2. Though the petitioners have raised several grounds, this Court is unable to find any ground which falls under Order 47 Rule 1 of C.P.C. Review is not an appeal. Unless there is an error apparent on the face of the record, or on any ground which falls within the purview of Order 47 Rule 1 CPC, this Court cannot entertain the review application. The submissions of the learned Additional Government Pleader for the petitioners are purely on merits and 2/4

hence this Court is unable to entertain this review application. The Review Application is therefore dismissed. No costs. (S.S.S.R., J.) (D.B.C., J.) 22.11.2023 Index : Yes / No mmi 3/4

S.S. SUNDAR, J.

and D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.

mmi 22.11.2023 4/4