Madras High CourtCRP(MD)/836/2017dismissed for nonprosecution

Seetharaman, v. Mahalakshmi (Died)

2023-10-11Honourable Mr Justice P.B. Balaji4 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 11.10.2023

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.BALAJI and C.M.P(MD)Nos.3718 of 2017 & 6897 of 2018 C.R.P(MD)No.836 of 2017 1.Seetharaman 2.Radhakrishnan ... Petitioners /Petitioners / Defendants 2&3 .Vs.

1.Mahalakshmi (Died) (Memo dated 27.07.2022 presented before the Court on 19.04.2023 is recorded as R1 died vide Court order, dated 19.04.2023 made in CRP(MD)No.836/2017) 2.Shanthi

...Respondents / Respondents/

Plaintiffs PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the order of the Additional Subordinate Judge, Dindigul, dated 10.01.2017, in I.A.No.316 of 2016 in O.S.No.56 of 2012.

1/4

C.R.P(MD)No.1568 of 2018 Muthulakshmi ... Petitioner / Petitioner / 1st Defendant .Vs.

1.Mahalakshmi (Died) (Memo dated 27.07.2022 presented before the Court on 19.04.2023 is recorded as R1 died vide Court order, dated 19.04.2023 made in CRP(MD)No.1568/2018) 2.Shanthi

...Respondents / Respondents/

Plaintiffs PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the order of the Additional Subordinate Judge, Dindigul, dated 27.11.2017, in I.A.No.237 of 2017 in O.S.No.56 of 2012.

(In both CRPs) For Petitioners :No appearance For Respondents :Mr.M.P.Senthil for R2, : R1 Died 2/4

COMMON ORDER These two Civil Revision Petitions have been posted under the caption "for dismissal", since there was no representation for the revision petitioners, on the earlier hearing date ie. 09.10.2023. Today (ie.11.10.2023), also there is no representation on bahalf of the revision petitioners in both the Civil Revision Petitions.

2. The learned counsel for the second respondent alone is present. Since this civil revision petitions are of the year 2017 & 2018 respectively and there is no representation for the petitioners today and also in the previous hearing, this Court is of the view that no purpose will be served to keep the civil revision petitions. Therefore, this Court is inclined to dismiss these civil revision petitions.

3. Hence, both the Civil Revision Petitions stand dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to cost. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

Index:Yes/No 11.10.2023 Internet:Yes/No NCC:Yes/No Ls 3/4

P.B.BALAJI,J.

Ls To

1. The Additional Subordinate Judge, Dindigul.

2.The Section Officer, VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

11.10.2023 4/4