Periyannan @ Praveen v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 17/11/2023 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V. SIVAGNANAM

1. Periyannan @ Praveen

2. Vandu @ Shanmugavel

3. Murugan

4. Vasanth

5. Vijayakumar

6. Packiyam

7. Karuppaiah

8. Shanmugam

9. Prabu

10. Chandrasekar

11. Kashthoori

12. Balamurugan

13. Ramalingam ... Petitioners / Accused No.2 to 4,6,7,9 to 11, 13 to 16 & 18 Vs The State rep by The Inspector of Police, Keelathooval Police Station, Ramanathapuram District.

(Crime No. 119 of 2023.) ... Respondent/Complainant Balamurugan ... Petitioner / Intervenor in CRL MP(MD) No.14826 of 2023 For Petitioners :

M/s.Muniyandi S, Advocate.

For Respondent :

Mr.Rms.Sethuraman, Additional Public Prosecutor 1/5

For Intervenor :

Mr.M.S.Jeyakarthik, Advocate PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No. 119 of 2023 on the file of the respondent Police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioners/ accused, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 323, 324 and 506(ii) and 307 IPC in Crime No.119 of 2023 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that due to wordy quarrel the petitioners herein have attacked the defacto complainant and also abused him in filthy language. Hence, the case.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent and they have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and their names have been falsely implicated in this case and hence, seeks anticipatory bail.

4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent submitted that the injured was discharged from the hospital. He would further 2/5

submit that the investigation of the case is pending.

5. On perusal of the FIR, it is noticed that there was a wordy quarrel between the parties.

6. Considering the nature of allegations made against the petitioners and also considering the period of incarceration and also taking into consideration of the principle stated by the Honourable Supreme Court in Sanjay Chandra and others vs. CBI reported in (2012)1 SCC 40 and the nature of the offence alleged by the petitioners, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

7. In view of the above, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Mudukulathur on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties each for a likesum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further conditions that : [a] the petitioners shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar Card or Bank 3/5

Pass Book to ensure their identity.

[b] the petitioners shall appear before the trial Court twice a month i.e., on 1st and 15th day of every English Calender month at 10.30 am am until further orders. [c] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[d] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial. [e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]. [f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

sd/- 17/11/2023 / TRUE COPY / /11/2023 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S. ) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TRP 4/5

To 1.The Judicial Magistrate, Mudukulathur.

2.Do through the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ramanathapuram District.

3.The Inspector of Police, Keelathooval Police Station, Ramanathapuram District.

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1 CC to M/s.S.MUNIYANDI, Advocate ( SR-16452[I] dated 17/11/2023 )

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.17843 of 2023 Date :17/11/2023 ED/JGB/SAR- (29/11/2023) 5P / 6C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023 5/5