← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/26041/2022disposed of

Mexican Recreation Club v. The State Tax Officer (Fac)

2022-11-17Honourable Mr Justice Mohammed Shaffiq4 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 17.11.2022

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ and W.M.P.(MD).No.20179 of 2022 Mexican Recreation Club, Rep.by its Secretary Siva Prasath, S/o.Baskaran Nair, No.13/71C/1, Balamore Road, Thittu Vilai, Kanyakumari District.

... Petitioner Vs.

The State Tax Officer (FAC), Office of the State Tax Officer, Nagercoil Rural.

... Respondent PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned notice issued by the respondent in TIN: 33786503288/2021-22, dated 03.11.2022 and quash the same. For Petitioner :Mr.T.Bashyam For Respondents :Mr.M.Prakash Additional Government Pleader

O R D E R

This writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned notice in TIN:33786503288/2021-22, dated 03.11.2022.

2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the Petitioner that the question that may arise for consideration is whether Article 366 (29A) of the Constitution of India inserted pursuant to the 46th Amendment has done away with the principles of mutuality. The issue now stands resolved by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of State of West Bengal Vs Calcutta Club Limited (Civil Appeal No.4184 of 2009) reported in (2019) 19 SCC 107 and therefore, the impugned proceedings is without jurisdiction.

3. Mr.M.Prakash, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for the Respondent.

4. It is submitted by the learned Government Advocate for the Respondent that the issue raised involves factual enquiry and therefore, the Petitioner ought to have submitted his objections and the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court is relevant, the same ought to have been relied upon by the petitioner and orders will be passed taking into account the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court.

5. This Court finds merits in the submission of the learned Government Advocate for the Respondent. This Court is of the view that the writ petition filed challenging the notice is premature. It is open to the petitioner to submit his objections and if so advised, place reliance upon the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in State of West Bengal Vs Calcutta Club Limited (Civil Appeal No.4184 of 2009). If the Petitioner files any objections, appropriate orders shall be passed by the Assessing Authority taking into consideration the objections and taking into account the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court.

6. With the above observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 17.11.2022 Index : Yes / No Speaking Order : Yes / No sbn To The State Tax Officer (FAC), Office of the State Tax Officer, Nagercoil Rural.

MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.

sbn and W.M.P.(MD).No.20179 of 2022 17.11.2022