Pandian v. The Superintendent Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 23.11.2022

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP Crl.O.P (MD) No.20537 of 2022 Pandian

...Petitioner

vs 1.The Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai District, Sivagangai.

2.The Inspector of Police, Anti Land Grabbing Special Cell, Sivagangai, Sivagangai District.

3.Rajendran

...Respondents

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, praying to direct the second respondent not to harass the Petitioner under the guise of enquiry without following due process of law. For Petitioner : Mr.D.Rameshkumar For R1 & R2 : Mr.T.Senthil Kumar Additional Public Prosecutor 1/4

O R D E R

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the second Respondent not to harass the Petitioner under the guise of enquiry. 2.When the case came up for hearing, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the Respondents 1 and 2 would submit that the enquiry is pending. He seeks two weeks time to report further developments. 3.Recording the submission of the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of. The Petitioner is directed to cooperate with the pending enquiry. The Respondents 1 and 2 are directed to follow the guidelines issued in the reported ruling of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Lalitha Kumari Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh reported in (2014) 2 SSC 1.

Internet:Yes/No 23.11.2022 Index:Yes/No mm 2/4

To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai District, Sivagangai.

2.The Inspector of Police, Anti Land Grabbing Special Cell, Sivagangai, Sivagangai District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

3/4

SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP , J.

mm Crl.O.P (MD) No.20537 of 2022 23.11.2022 4/4