← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/20653/2022ordered

Manikandan v. The Inspector Of Police

2022-12-09Honourable Mr Justice K.Murali Shankar3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 09/12/2022 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice K.MURALI SHANKAR Manikandan ... Petitioner/Accused(sole) Vs The State rep.by The Inspector of Police, Nadukaveri Police Station, Thanjavur District.

(Crime No.119/2022).

... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr. Dhilipan Pandian.R.L., Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.R.Meenakshi Sundaram, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No. 119 of 2022 on the file of the respondent Police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner/Accused, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Section 379 of IPC and Section 21(1) of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, in Crime No.119 of 2022 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner has illegally transported 1/4 unit of river sand in bullock cart. Hence, the complaint.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that the petitioner was granted anticipatory bail in the subsequent case in Crime No.124 of 2022 on the file of the Nadukaveri Police Station, Thanjavur District, in Crl.OP(MD)No.20029 of 2022, dated 11.11.2022. However, he would 1/3

further submit that the petitioner without prejudice to his right, is ready to deposit the amount that may be imposed by this Court. 4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent police would submit that the petitioner has transported 1/4 unit of river sand illegally. He would further submit that the petitioner is having 12 previous cases, out of which, five cases are pending and other cases were disposed of.

5.No doubt, the petitioner's earlier application in Crl.OP(MD) No.6757 of 2022, was dismissed by this Court, vide order dated 25.04.2022.

6.Considering the above facts and considering fact that the property has already been recovered and also taking note of the quantum of sand alleged to have been seized from the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

7.Accordingly, the petitioner shall pay a sum of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand only) to the credit of the District Mineral Foundation Trust, Thanjavur District, without prejudice to his rights and contentions before the trial Court and produce the receipt/acknowledgment before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvaiyaru, Thanajvur District.

8.On production of such receipt/acknowledgment, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvaiyaru, Thanajvur District, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/-(Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further conditions that:

[a]the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhaar card or bank pass book to ensure their identity.

[b]the petitioner shall report before respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of one month and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation.

[c]the petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[d]the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

2/3

[e]On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [f]If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

sd/- 09/12/2022 / TRUE COPY / /12/2022 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

das TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THIRUVAIYARU, THANAJVUR DISTRICT.

2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THANJAVUR @ KUMBAKONAM.

3.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NADUKAVERI POLICE STATION, THANJAVUR DISTRICT.

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

COPY TO THE OFFICER IN CHARGE, DISTRICT MINERAL FOUNDATION TRUST, THANJAVUR DISTRICT.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.20653 of 2022 Date :09/12/2022 RK/BUC/SAR-1 (21/12/2022) 3P/6C 3/3