← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/20654/2022granted

Prabhu v. The Inspector Of Police

2022-11-22Honourable Mr Justice A.A.Nakkiran3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 22/11/2022 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice A.A.NAKKIRAN Prabhu ... Petitioner/Accused No.1 Vs The State rep.by The Inspector of Police, Civil Supplies CID, Kuzhithurai at Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.

(Crime No.246/2022). ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : M/s.Lenin Kumar T, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.M.Muthumanikkam, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.246/2022 on the file of the respondent police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner/Accused No.1, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Clause 6(2)(3)(4) of TNSC (RDCS) Order 1982 r/w Section 7(1)(a)(ii) of Essential Commodities Act, 1955, in Crime No.246 of 2022, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner and other accused have illegally transported 250 bags of rice (each contains 50 kgs). Hence, the present complaint.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the based on the confession statement of the co-accused, the petitioner was falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he did not commit any offence as alleged by the prosecution. Hence, he may be granted anticipatory bail.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent would submit that the petitioner and other accused 1/3

have illegally transported 250 bags of rice worth about Rs.70,625/-. The entire contraband was seized by the respondent police. He would further submit that the petitioner is having one previous case of similar in nature and the investigation in this case is not yet completed,. Hence, he strongly opposed to grant anticipatory bail. 5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and Considering the nature of offence and also the fact that the entire contraband was seized by the respondent police, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

6.Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed and the petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) to the credit of Government Rajaji Hospital, Madurai, (Indian Bank, Tallakulam (233) Branch, CIF No:30418657357, IFSC Code: IDIB000T003, MICR Code: 625019008, A/c No:7097546149) for the purpose of constructing Cancer Institute, without prejudice to his rights and contentions before the trial Court and produce the receipt/acknowledgment before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.III, Nagercoil.

7. On production of such receipt, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.III, Nagercoil, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent Police or to the Police Officer, who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further conditions that: a)the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

(b)the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10:30 am until further orders;

(c)the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

(d)the petitioner shall be present before the Court on hearing dates and before the respondent police as and when required; (e)on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and;

2/3

(f)if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

sd/- 22/11/2022 / TRUE COPY / /12/2022 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.III NAGERCOIL.

2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT AT NAGERCOIL.

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CIVIL SUPPLIES CID, KUZHITHURAI AT NAGERCOIL, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT.

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

COPY TO:

THE DEAN, GOVERNMENT RAJAJI HOSPITAL, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.LENIN KUMAR T Advocate SR.No.13488

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.20654 of 2022 Date :22/11/2022 CP SA/SSS/SAR.1/01.12.2022/3P/7C 3/3