Sridharan @ Sridharan Sivam v. The State Of Tamilnadu

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 19.03.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.DHANABAL and Crl.M.P(MD)Nos.11369 & 11370 of 2024 1.Sridharan @ Sridharan Sivam 2.Vijayalakshmi ... Petitioners Vs.

1.The State, Represented by, The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Thilagar Thidal, Madurai.

Crime No.47 of 2022.

2.Manthra ... Respondents Prayer : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of B.N.S.S., 2023, to call for the records relating to the impugned charge sheet in C.C.No.899 of 1/5

2023 on the file of the learned Additional Mahila Judicial Magistrate, Madurai and quash the same and pass such further or other orders as this Court. For Petitioners : Mr.K.Rajeshwaran For R-1 : Mr.M.Vaikkam Karunanithi Government Advocate (Crl. Side) For R-2 : Mr.P.Shanmugam

ORDER

This petition has been filed by the petitioners to call for the records pertaining to the C.C.No.899 of 2023 on the file of the learned Additional Mahila Judicial Magistrate, Madurai and quash the same.

2. According to the petitioners, the defacto complainant is known person to the petitioners. Based on the complaint given by the second respondent/defacto complainant, the police has registered an FIR in Crime No. 47 of 2022. After investigation filed Final Report and the Trial Court has taken cognizance for the offences under Sections 498(A), 406 and 506(1) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

2/5

3. When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Counsels on both sides represented that during pendency of the case in C.C.No.899 of 2023, the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and they have entered into a compromise and the same was filed before this Court.

4. Today, the defacto-complainant and all the accused are present and the defacto-complainant represented that they entered into a compromise as the petitioners are known person. A compromise memo, dated 21.08.2024 signed by the parties, is also filed before this Court.

5. This Court has perused the terms of the compromise memo.

6. Considering the nature of the offences, the relationship between the parties and they have also entered into a compromise, it is appropriate to allow this petition.

7. Recording the said compromise, this petition is allowed and C.C.No. 899 of 2023 on the file of the learned Additional Mahila Judicial Magistrate, Madurai is quashed. The compromise memo, dated 21.08.2024 filed by the 3/5

parties shall form part of this order. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions stand closed.

19.03.2025 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes BTR To 1.The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Thilagar Thidal, Madurai.

2.The Additional Mahila Judicial Magistrate, Madurai.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

4/5

P.DHANABAL, J.

BTR 19.03.2025 5/5