← Library
Madras High Court/18523/2024dismissed

M.Ajith Kumar v. The State Of Tamil Nadu

2024-10-28Honourable Mr Justice D.Bharatha Chakravarthy4 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 28.10.2024 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY M.Ajith Kumar ... Petitioner/ Accused No.1 Vs The State of Tamil Nadu Rep by its, The Inspector of Police, Kallidaikurichi Police Station, Tirunelveli District.

(Crime No. 318 of 2024) ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.T.A.Ebenezer, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.A.Albert James Government Advocate (Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS Act. PRAYER :- For Anticipatory bail in Crime No.318 of 2024 on the file of the respondent police.

1/4

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner/Accused Nos.1, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 308(4) and 351

(3) of BNS, in Crime No.318 of 2024 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner and the other accused abused and threatened the de-facto complainant and ran away. Hence, the complaint.

3.Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the material records of the case.

4. Considering the nature of the allegations in this case and considering the previous antecedents, the earlier anticipatory bail was filed and the petition was dismissed and the learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that out of the 8 cases, 3 cases are only under Section 110 of Cr.P.C. and the same have been disposed of and even considering the same, still the petitioner has got five previous cases and 2/4

the learned counsel only submit that some of the cases have been disposed of and therefore, the same could not be considered. Going through the list of cases, the petitioner is even convicted in one case. Therefore, when considering the overall facts and circumstances the case, the anticipatory bail petition has been rejected and no ground is made out to take a different view by entertaining the second application. Hence, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. 5.Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. sd/- 28/10/2024 / TRUE COPY / / 11 /2024 Sub-Assistant Registrar ( CS-I / II / III / IV ) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

pal TO

1. The Inspector of Police, Kallidaikurichi Police Station, Tirunelveli District.

2. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

3/4

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.18523 of 2024 Date : 28.10.2024 SI/MMS/ -(15.11.2024) 4P/ 3C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023. 4/4