V.Petchiammal, v. Fithose Fathima,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 12.01.2023

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Cont.P(MD).No.1762 of 2022 in W.P(MD).No.19791 of 2022 V.Petchiammal ... Petitioner/Petitioner vs.

Fithose Fathima Revenue Divisional Officer, Melur, Madurai District.

... Contemnor/2nd Respondent PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the contemnor for violating the order of this Court in W.P(MD).No.19791 of 2022 dated 26.08.2022.

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Gokulraj For Respondent : Mrs.S.Jeyapriya Government Advocate

ORDER

Heard the learned counsel on either side.

2. I am satisfied that the respondent had acted correctly in the matter. When the petitioner had not sought maintenance or cancellation of any document executed by her, the question of the Maintenance Tribunal https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

G.R.SWAMINATHAN,J., Rmk assuming jurisdiction does not arise at all. The respondent had acted responsibly in forwarding the petitioner's complaint to the jurisdictional police.

3. The contempt petition is closed accordingly. 12.01.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Rmk To Revenue Divisional Officer, Melur, Madurai District.

Cont.P(MD).No.1762 of 2022 in W.P(MD).No.19791 of 2022 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis