Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/18714/2023allowed

Sheik Syed v. The Inspector Of Police

2023-12-12Honourable Mr Justice G.Ilangovan4 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:12.12.2023

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN Sheik Syed ... Petitioner Vs.

1.State Rep.by The Inspector of Police, Natham Police Station, Dindigul District.

(In Crime No.40/2023) 2.Seeni ... Respondents PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, to call for the records relating to the first Information report in C.C No. 63 of 2023 on the file of the Learned Judicial Magistrate Natham, Dindigul District and quash the same in so far as the petitioner concerned.

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Arjun For R1 : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar Government Advocate(Crl.side) For R2 : Mr.B.Vinoth kumar 1/4

ORDER

This Criminal Original Petition is filed to call for the records relating to the first Information report in C.C No. 63 of 2023 on the file of the Learned Judicial Magistrate Natham, Dindigul District and quash the same in so far as the petitioner concerned. 2.The contention of the petitioner is that based on the complaint lodged by the 2nd respondent, the 1st respondent registered the First Information Report in Crime No.40 of 2023 for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 324, 506(2) of IPC, against the petitioner. 3.The further contention of the petitioner is that they compromised the issue with the 2nd respondent amicably. A joint memo of compromise was filed, which has been duly signed by the petitioner and the 2nd respondent and also by their respective counsels. 4.The petitioner and the 2nd respondent appeared before this Court along with their counsels and also produced their Aadhar cards. They were also identified by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor and the Investigation Officer. Both the parties were enquired by me and they 2/4

accepted the terms of compromise. Hence, the Compromise Memo is recorded.

5.Considering the totality of the circumstances, the nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioner and also in view of the joint compromise memo, dated 04.10.2023, this Court is of the opinion that no useful purpose will be served by keeping the matter pending. Hence, all further proceedings in C.C No. 63 of 2023 on the file of the Learned Judicial Magistrate Natham, Dindigul District, is quashed and the compromise memo is recorded.

6.In the result, the Criminal Original Petition stands allowed and the entire proceedings in C.C No. 63 of 2023 on the file of the Learned Judicial Magistrate Natham, Dindigul District, is hereby quashed in respect of the petitioner and the terms of joint compromise memo shall form part of this order.

12.12.2023 NCC :

Yes / No Index :

Yes / No Internet :

Yes / No pnn 3/4

G.ILANGOVAN , J.

pnn To 1.The Judicial Magistrate Natham, Dindigul District. 2.The Inspector of Police, Natham Police Station, Dindigul District. (In Crime No.40/2023) 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

12.12.2023 4/4