Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/18627/2019dismissed

Vijaya v. The Inspector Of Police

2019-12-12Honourable Mr Justice A.D.Jagadish Chandira2 pages

Crl.O.P.(MD)No. 18627 of 2019 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 12.12.2019

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA Crl.O.P.(MD)No. 18627 of 2019 and Crl.M.P.(MD) No. 10938 of 2019

1. Vijaya

2. Manokaran ... Petitioners/Accused Nos.2 and 3 Vs

1. The Inspector of Police All Women Police Station Thallakulam, Madurai City (Crime No.55 of 2018) ... Respondent/Complainant

2. Amrutha ... Respondent/Defacto Complainant Prayer:Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to call for the FIR pertaining to the case in Crime No. 55 of 2018 on the file of the first respondent police and quash the same as against the petitioners.

For Petitioners : Mr.S.Ramasany for Mr.V.Sriram For Respondent : Mrs.S.Bharathi No.1 Government Advocate (crl. Side )

ORDER

This petition has been filed to quash the FIR in Crime No. 55 of 2018 on the file of the first respondent police as against the petitioners.

2. The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners did not commit any offences as alleged in the impugned FIR. Without any base, the first respondent police registered a case as against the petitioners in Crime No. 55 of 2018 for the offences under Sections 498(A) and 406 of IPC. Hence he prayed to quash the same.

3.The learned Government Advocate (criminal side) would submit that investigation is still pending and this petition is in premature stage and hence, he prayed for dismissal of this petition.

4. Perused the materials available on record.

5. It is seen from the First Information Report that there are specific allegation as against the petitioners, which has to be investigated. Further the FIR is not an encyclopedia and it need not contain all facts. Further, it cannot be quashed in the threshold. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

Crl.O.P.(MD)No. 18627 of 2019 This Court finds that the FIR discloses prima facie commission of cognizable offence and as such this Court cannot interfere with the investigation. The investigating machinery has to investigate, grab and unearth the crime in accordance with the procedures prescribed in the Code.

6. In view of the above, this Court is not inclined to quash the FIR in Crime No. 55 of 2018. Accordingly, this criminal original petition is dismissed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed. Further the respondent police is directed to complete the investigation and file final report before the concerned Court within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar // True Copy // Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) aav To

1. The Inspector of Police All Women Police Station Thallakulam, Madurai City 2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

Crl.O.P.(MD)No. 18627 of 2019 and Crl.M.P.(MD) No. 10938 of 2019 12.12.2019 KK/SAR/03.01.2020/2P-3C/ https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2