Krishnan.S v. The Commissioner

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 30.11.2022

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and W.M.P.(MD)No.21137 of 2022 S.Krishnan ... Petitioner Vs.

The Commissioner, Ottanchathiram Municipality, Ottanchathiram, Dindigul.

... Respondent Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records on the file of the respondent in connection with the impugned order of suspension passed by him in his proceedings in Na.Ka.No.1229/2019/P1 dated 21.09.2019 and consequentially rejection order passed in Na.Ka.No.1229/2019/P1 dated 06.07.2021 regarding revocation of suspension and quash both as illegal and consequently direct the respondent to post him in any non-sensitive post by reinstate him in service, based on petitioner representation dated 02.07.2021 within the time limit that may be stipulated by this Court.

1/4

For Petitioner : Mr.G.Thalaimutharasu For Respondent : Mr.D.Mauriya, Standing Counsel.

ORDER

Heard the learned counsel on either side.

2.The writ petitioner was suspended from service following his implication in a vigilance case. The petitioner seeks reinstatement. The petitioner is permitted to submit a fresh representation before the respondent. If such representation is submitted, the same shall be considered and final order passed by the respondent within a period of six weeks thereafter. I make it clear that I have not gone into the merits of the matter. It is open to the respondent to pass order one way or the other. 3.With this liberty to the writ petitioner and direction to the respondent, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

30.11.2022 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias 2/4

3/4

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.

ias 30.11.2022 4/4