Shayinsha v. The Inspector Of Police

Crl.O.P.(MD).No.18888 of 2019 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 17.12.2019

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.D. JAGADISH CHANDIRA Crl.O.P.(MD).No.18888 of 2019

1. Shayinsha

2. Yasmin

3. Syed Imamudeen

4. Jarina ..Petitioners Vs.

1.The State Represented by, The Inspector of Police, Fort Police Station, Trichy City, Trichy.

(Crime No. 822 of 2019).

2. Fathima Banu ... Respondents PRAYER: This Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, to call for the records relating to the proceedings in Crime No. 822 of 2019 on the file of the first respondent police and quash the same.

For Petitioner : Mr.K.P. Narayanakumar For R1 : Mr.S.Bharathi Government Advocate (Crl. side) For R2 : Mr.Balakrishnan

O R D E R

The Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the FIR in Crime No. 822 of 2019 on the file of the frist respondent police, pursuant to the compromise arrived at between the parties. 2.The case is still at the stage of investigation. By passage of time, the parties have decided to bury their hatchet and compromise the dispute amicably among themselves.

3. A Joint Memo of Compromise has been filed before this Court, which have been signed by the petitioners and the second respondent and also by their respective counsel. The petitioners and the second respondent were also present in person before this Court https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

Crl.O.P.(MD).No.18888 of 2019 and they were identified by Mr.S. Vaiyapuri, SSI. This Court also enquired both the parties and was satisfied that the parties have come to an amicable settlement between themselves. 4.Under such circumstances, no useful purpose will be served in keeping the First Information Report pending, even though, the offences involved are not compoundable in nature. In the light of the guidelines given by the Hon'ble Supreme Court reported in 2017 9 SCC 641-(Parbathbhai Aahir @ Parbathbhai Vs. State of Gujrath), this Court in exercise of its jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashes the First Information Report in Crime No. 822 of 2019. 5.It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioner has paid a sum of Rs.5000/-(Rupees Five thousand only) as costs to the Credit of the Women Advocates Association, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai and filed the original cash receipt along with this memo on 17.12.2019. The said submission is placed on record.

6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands allowed and as a sequel, the proceedings in Crime No. 822 of 2019, on the file of the first respondent police, is quashed and the terms of joint compromise memo shall form part and parcel of this order. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(Crl Side) // True Copy // Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) ksa To

1. The Inspector of Police, Fort Police Station, Trichy City, Trichy.

2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1 CC to M/s.K.P.NARAYANAKUMAR, Advocate ( SR-105605[F] dated 18/12/2019 ) Crl.O.P.(MD).No.18888 of 2019 17.12.2019 GRL(CO) TR(19.12.2019)2P 4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2