← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/21541/2022ordered

Arumaidurai v. The Inspector Of Police

2022-12-12Honourable Mr Justice A.D.Jagadish Chandira3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 12.12.2022 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA 1.Arumaidurai 2.Muthupandi 3.Chellapandi 4.Sonaiyammal

...Petitioners/Accused No.4,5,6,8

-vsThe State represented by The Inspector of Police, Silaiman Police Station, Madurai District.

(Cr.No.503 of 2022)

...Respondent/Complainant

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C, praying to enlarge the petitioners on bail in the event of their arrest in connection with Cr.No.503 of 2022 on the file of the respondent Police.

For Petitioners : Mr.J.Senthil Kumaraiah For Respondent : Mr.M.Veeranthiran Government Advocate (Crl.side) ****

O R D E R

The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent Police for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 323, 324 and 506(ii) of IPC in Crime No.503 of 2022 on the file of the respondent Police, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution, as per the de-facto complainant, Prabakaran, is that due to previous enmity, the petitioner along with other accused have abused and assaulted the de-facto complainant with iron rod and causing injury to the de-facto complainant. Hence, the complaint.

3.The learned Counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are innocent and a false complaint has been given only based on the suspicion that they are the associates of the main accused. He would also submit that the main accused had been arrested and released on bail and the injured has been discharged from the hospital.

1/3

4.The learned Government Advocate (crl.side) would submit that due to previous enmity, the petitioner and other accused have abused and assaulted the de-facto complainant with iron rod and the injured has also been discharged from hospital. He would also submit that the main accused has been released on bail.

5.Heard the learned Counsel. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. 6.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Madurai, on condition that the petitioners shall execute bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that: [a] the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

[b] the petitioners shall report before the respondent police everyday at 10.30 a.m., for a period of four weeks, thereafter every Saturday at 10.30 am until further orders.

[c] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[d] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

sd/- 12/12/2022 / TRUE COPY / /12/2022 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

2/3

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, MADURAI.

2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI.

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SILAIMAN POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT.

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.SENTHIL KUMARAIAH J Advocate SR.No.14743

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.21541 of 2022 Date :12/12/2022 SS/VR/SAR III/21/12/2022/ 3P 6C 3/3