← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/18894/2019allowed

Ravana v. The Inspector Of Police

2019-12-16Honourable Mr Justice A.D.Jagadish Chandira3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 16.12.2019

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA and Crl.M.P.(MD)Nos.11087 & 11088 of 2019

1. Ravana

2. Anbarasu

3. Maitheen Bava

4. Bilavendran

5. Murugesan

6. Mohandoss

7. Veerakumar

8. Krishnamoorthy

9. Kalimuthu

10. S. Manivel

11. R. Sahul Hammed

12. S. Ramdoss

13. Maideen Batcha

14. Periyarmani

15. Mohammed Rafiq

16. Hakkem Sait, S/o.Kathar Maideen

17. S.A. Mathiya Divarasan

18. K. Prabu

19. A. Ganesan

20. Jeeva Sangamithran

21. Hakkim Sait, S/o.Kathursha

22. G.Pandiyan

23. Hakkim Sait, S/o.Jaffar Sait

24. Pagalavan

25. Gnanasekar

26. Ferna

27. C. Ravanan

28. Periyar Nambi

29. Hakkim Sait, S/o.Kamuludeen

30. K. Kumaresan

31. S. Gopi Krishnan

32. V. Kaliraj

33. SU.S. Manoharan

34. V. Ganesan ... Petitioners -Vs1. State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Town Police Station, Dindigul.

(Crime No. 37 of 2015) 1/3

2. C. Kannan, The Inspector of Police, Town Police Station, Dindigul.

... Respondents Prayer: Criminal Original petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for the records pertaining to C.C. No. 12 of 2015 pending before the Judicial Magistrate Court No.III, Dindigul for the offences under Sections 143 & 188 of IPC on the file of the first respondent and quash the same as illegal. For Petitioners : Mr.S. Vanchinathan For R-1 : Mr.S. Chandrasekar, Additional Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the proceedings in C.C. No.12 of 2015 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.III, Dindigul for the offences under Sections 143 & 188 of IPC on the file of the first respondent as against the petitioners.

2.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the facts of the case are exactly similar to the case covered in the decision reported in 2018 2 LW (Crl) 606 [Jeevanandham and others vs. The Inspector of Police Velayuthampalayam Police Station, Karur District] dated 20.09.2018 and in the case of Sri Raja vs Inspector of Police, Sivakasi Town Police Station Virudhunagar District and other in batch of cases in Crl.O.P(MD) No.7922 of 2019 dated 30.08.2019

3. The learned Government Advocate(Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police would submit that the facts of the case are similar to the facts covered under the Judgment referred above. 4.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate(Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police.

5. Perused the material records available on record. 6.The facts of this case is similar to the facts covered by the Judgment of this Court reported in 2018 2 LW (Crl) 606 [Jeevanandham and others vs. The Inspector of Police Velayuthampalayam Police Station, Karur District] dated 20.09.2018 and in case of Sri Raja vs Inspector of Police, Sivakasi Town Police Station Virudhunagar District and others in batch of cases in Crl.O.P(MD) No.7922 of 2019 dated 30.08.2019. Accordingly, the proceedings in C.C. No. 12 of 2015 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.III, 2/3

Dindigul is hereby quashed insofar as the petitioners are concerned and the Criminal Original Petition is allowed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-III) // True Copy // / /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS ) ksa To

1. The Judicial Magistrate No.III, Dindigul.

2. The Inspector of Police, Town Police Station, Dindigul.

3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1 CC to MR.R.GANESH PRABU, Advocate (SR-105218[F] dated 16/12/2019 ) 16.12.2019 MK (21.01.2020) 3P 5C 3/3