← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/14695/2025allowed

Seyed Al Haseer v. The State Of Tamil Nadu

2025-09-08Honourable Mr Justice Sunder Mohan7 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 08.09.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN Crl.O.P.(MD).No.14695 of 2025 Seyed Al Haseer ... Petitioner/Accused No.1 Vs.

1. The State of Tamilnadu, Rep.

by its The Inspector of Police, Thirupulani Police Station, Ramanathapuram District.

... 1st Respondent/Complainant

2. Panchavarnam ... 2nd Respondent/Defacto Complainant Prayer : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 BNSS, to call for the records pertaining to C.C.No.85 of 2019 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.I, Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram District and quash the same insofar as the petitioner is concerned. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Yasar Arafath For R-1 : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi Additional Public Prosecutor For R-2 : Mr.J.Mohamed Ibrahim

ORDER

The petitioner seeks for quashing the impugned final report in C.C.No.85 of 2019 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.I, 1/7

Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram District, for the offences under Sections 294(b), 323 and 506(i) I.P.C.

2. The allegation against the petitioner is that due to previous enmity, the petitioner and other accused abused the defacto complainant in filthy language and attacked her with iron rods and wooden logs and thus, he committed the aforesaid offences.

3. The petitioner and the defacto complainant have since arrived at a compromise and had filed a joint compromise memo, by which the defacto complainant has agreed for quashing of the impugned final report, on the basis of the compromise.

2/7

3/7

4/7

4. The said compromise memo is taken on record. The second respondent is present in person, who is identified by Mr.T.Senthoor, HC901, Thirupulani Police Station. She confirms the compromise entered into between her and the petitioner.

5. Therefore, this Court is of the view that no useful purpose would be served in keeping the trial pending. Accordingly the impugned charge sheet in C.C.No.85 of 2019 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.I, Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram District, is hereby quashed, in terms of the joint compromise memo.

5/7

6. This Criminal Original Petition is allowed. 08.09.2025 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No LS To 1.The Inspector of Police, Puthukadai Police Station, Puthukadai, Kanniyakumari District.

2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

6/7

SUNDER MOHAN, J.

LS Crl.O.P(MD).No.14695 of 2025 08.09.2025 7/7