Madras High CourtWP(MD)/28025/2022dismissed

Bindhu v. The Additional Chief Secretary

2022-12-14Honourable Mr Justice G.R.Swaminathan4 pages

1 W.P.(MD)NO.28025 OF 2022 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 14.12.2022

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN W.P.(MD)No.28025 of 2022 Bindhu ... Petitioner Vs.

1. The Additional Chief Secretary, Administration Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Chennai - 600 009.

2. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, O/o.The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Maharaja Nagar, Tirunelveli - 627 011.

3. The Commissioner of Police, Tirunelveli City, O/o.The Commissioner of Police, Tirunelveli District.

4. The Regional Director, Reserve Bank of India, Regional Office, Chennai - 600 001.

5. The Road Transport Office, Tenkasi, Road Transport Office, Tenkasi District.

6. The Administrator, Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd., Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli District.

... Respondents 1/4

2 W.P.(MD)NO.28025 OF 2022 Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to instruct other 2nd to 5th respondents to take action on the 6th respondent to settle the loan agreement and hand over the original R.C.Book of vehicle No.TN 69 AE 5495 on the basis of the representation dated 04.11.2022. For Petitioner : Mr.B.Char Murugan For R-1 & R-5 : Mr.M.Lingadurai, Special Government Pleader.

For R-2 & R-3 : Mr.R.Sivakumar, Government Advocate(Crl.Side).

* * *

O R D E R

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for respondents 1 and 5 and the learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side) appearing for respondents 2 and 3.

2. The petitioner wants this Court to direct the official respondents to take action against the sixth respondent. 2/4

3 W.P.(MD)NO.28025 OF 2022

3. The petitioner is having a private transaction with the sixth respondent. The petitioner has to work out his rights and remedies elsewhere. Filing the writ petition is not a remedy.

4. With the aforesaid liberty to the petitioner, this writ petition stands dismissed. No costs.

14.12.2022 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No PMU To: