Arumugam v. The Inspector Of Police
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
CRL OP(MD). No.19004 of 2019 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 20/12/2019 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN CRL OP(MD). No.19004 of 2019 Arumugam ... Petitioner/Sole Accused Vs The State rep.by The Inspector of Police, Keeraithurai Police Station, Madurai City.
Crime No.947 of 2019 ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : M/s. M.Jegadeesh Pandian, Advocate.
For Respondent : Mr.A.Robinson, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.439 of Cr.P.C.
PRAYER :- for Bail in Crime No.947 of 2019 on the file of the respondent police.
ORDER : The Court made the following order :- Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent.
2. The petitioner is arrayed as sole accused. He was arrested and remanded to Judicial Custody on 06.11.2019 for the offences punishable under sections 392 r/w 397 and 506(ii) of I.P.C., in Crime No.947 of 2019 on the file of the respondent police. He seeks bail.
3. The learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side) submitted that Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 has been invoked against the petitioner. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2
CRL OP(MD). No.19004 of 2019
4. Hence, I am not inclined to grant relief to the petitioner. The criminal original petition stands dismissed. sd/- 20/12/2019 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO 1.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KEERAITHURAI POLICE STATION, MADURAI CITY.
2.THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, MADURAI.
3.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.19004 of 2019 Date :20/12/2019 PMU TK/JC/SAR.3./06.01.2020/2P/4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2