Madras High CourtWP(MD)/11541/2017dismissed as infructuous

A.Piramanayagam v. Chennai Medical College

2024-08-13Honourable Mr Justice Abdul Quddhose4 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ATED : 13.08.2024

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE and W.M.P.(MD).No.8879 of 2017 A.Piramanayagam ... Petitioner Vs.

1.Chennai Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Irungalur, Trichy-621 105, Represented by its Dean.

2.Medical Council of India Sector -8, Dwarakar, New Delhi - 110077, Represented by its Secretary.

3.The Tamil Nadu Dr.M.G.R Medical University, 69, Anna Salai, Guindy, Chennai - 600 032, Represented by its Vice Chancellor.

4.Dr.S.Elango Professor and Head, Department of Community Medicine, Chennai Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Irungalur, Trichy - 621 105.

... Respondents 1/4

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the order No.984/CMCH AND RC/DEAN/2014, dated 11.10.2014 and the appointment of Dr.Elango and 4th Respondent and quash the same as illegal and consequently to direct the MCI to speedily conduct the scrutiny of the substantial evidences submitted by me on 11.10.2014 and order appropriate and suitable action against the Respondents to immediately invoke a two year ban on Chennai Medical College and Research Centre, Trichy as per Regulation 8(3)(1)(d) of the Establishment of Medical College Regulations, 1999 and order the MCI and Chennai Medical College and Research Centre, Trichy to pay Rs.5 (five)crores, as compensation for the sufferings that the petitioner have undergone which is in violation of both the fundamental rights of the constitution and human rights.

For Petitioner : No Appearance For R-1 : Mr.S.Anwar Sameem for Ms.Swaraswathi For R-2 : No Appearance For R-3 : No Appearance For R-4 : Mr.G.Thalaimutharasu 2/4

O R D E R

There is no representation on the said of the petitioner.

2. It is represented by the learned counsel appearing for the fourth respondent that the Writ Petition has now become infructuous, since the petitioner has challenged the appointment order of the fourth respondent, who is no more.

3. Recording the above said submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the fourth respondent that the fourth respondent is no more, this Writ Petition stands dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

13.08.2024 NCC:yes/no Index:yes/no Internet:yes/no TSG To The Director of Medical Education, O/o. the Director of Medical Education, EVR Periyar Salai, Kilpauk, Chennai-10.

3/4

ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.

TSG 13.08.2024 4/4