Madras High CourtWP(MD)/27005/2019dismissed as infructuous

A.Palanichamy v. The Commissioner

2024-09-25Honourable Mr Justice Abdul Quddhose4 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 25.09.2024

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.23357, 23359 & 23363 to 23365 of 2019 A.Palanichamy ... Petitioner in WP(MD)No.27005/2019 S.Masanam ... Petitioner in WP(MD)No.27007/2019 T.Shenbagarajani ... Petitioner in WP(MD)No.27015/2019 K.Karuppaiah ... Petitioner in WP(MD)No.27016/2019 M.Venkatraman ... Petitioner in WP(MD)No.27017/2019 /Vs./ 1.The Commissioner, Central Provident Fund Organization, Bhavishya Nidhi Bhavan, 14, Bhikaji Cama Block, New Delhi - 110 066.

2.The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Employees Provident Fund Organization, Madurai - 2.

...Respondents in all petitions

1/4

COMMON P RAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents from making recovery from the petitioner's pension towards the amount paid as commuted value of pension.

Appearance in all petitions:- For Petitioner : Mr.M.Sankaralingam for Mr.R.Subramanian For Respondents : Mr.V.S.Karthi Standing Counsel COMMON ORDER The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the reliefs sought for in these writ petitions have now become infructuous and he has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle. 2/4

Accordingly, these writ petitions are dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 25.09.2024 Index : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No Sm 3/4

ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.

Sm Common Order made in Dated:

25.09.2024 4/4