← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/21883/2022ordered

Karthi v. The Inspector Of Police

2022-12-12Honourable Mr Justice A.D.Jagadish Chandira3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 12/12/2022 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA CRL OP(MD). No.21883 of 2022 Karthi ... Petitioner/Sole Accused Vs State rep.by The Inspector of Police, Ammapet Police Station, Thanjavur District.

(Crime No.1690 of 2022).

... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : M/s.Durai Pandian K.S., Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.P.Kottaichamy, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.1690 of 2022 on the file of the Respondent Police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent Police for the offences punishable under Sections 4(1) (a), 4(1-A), 4(1)(i) of Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act, in Crime No.1690 of 2022 on the file of the respondent Police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that on 25.11.2022, when the respondent police was in patrol duty, the petitioner herein was illegally found in possession of 18 bottles (each contains 180 ml) of Brandy. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and his name has been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that the petitioner is ready and willing to deposit a sum of Rs.10,000/- to any one of the welfare scheme without prejudice to his rights contention and seeks anticipatory bail.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) would submit that there is no previous case against the petitioner. He would further submit that the petitioner herein has illegally found in possession of 18 bottles (each contains 180 ml) of Brandy and hence, he strongly opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. I have heard the learned counsel appearing on either side. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate - Cum - Munsiff, Papansam, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that: [a] the petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) to the credit of Madurai Bench of Madras High Court Advocate Clerk's Welfare Association, Madurai - 625023 (Account No:-496039124, IFSC Code:-IDIB000H040), without prejudice to his rights and contentions before the trial Court and produce the receipt/acknowledgment before the concerned Court while executing sureties;

[b] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

[c] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter, once in a week i.e., on every Saturday at 10.30 am until further orders. [d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[e] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

Sd/- 12/12/2022 / TRUE COPY / /12/2022 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.I) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TRP TO

1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE-CUM- MUNSIFF, PAPANASAM.

2. -DO- THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THANJAVUR DISTRICT AT KUMBAKONAM.

3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, AMMAPET POLICE STATION, THANJAVUR DISTRICT.

4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

COPY TO:

THE OFFICER INCHARGE, ADVOCATE CLERKS WELFARE ASSOCIATION, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.21883 of 2022 Date :12/12/2022 SP/SSS/SAR I/19/12/2022/3P/6C