Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/22813/2022dismissed as infructuous

Ansar Maideen v. The Inspector Of Police

2022-12-22Honourable Mr Justice G.Ilangovan4 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 22.12.2022

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN Crl.O.P.(MD) No.22813 of 2022 and Crl.M.P.(MD).No.16144 of 2022 1.Ansar Maideen 2.Ishak Ali 3.Jafar Ali 4.Yasar Arafath 5.Sheikh Farid 6.Ismail 7.Sakkarai Bava 8.Sheikh Farid 9.Mohamed Arabu 10.Riyashkhan 11.Mohamed Maideen 12.Babu 13.Siddiq Batcha 14.Thameem Ansari 15.Al Ameen 16.Mohamed bakrudeen ... Petitioners/Accused 1 to 16 Vs.

1.State represented through the Inspector of Police, Vedasandur Police Station, Dindigul District.

(in Crime No.45 of 2018) ... 1st Respondent/Complainant 2.Saravanakumar ... 2nd Respondent/Defacto Complainant 1/4

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, to call for the records of impugned charge sheet in S.T.C.No.107 of 2020 on the file of the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Vedasandur and quash the same as illegal as against the petitioners.

For Petitioners : Mr.A.Mohamed Riyas For Respondents : Mr.M.Muthumanikkam for R1 Government Advocate (Crl. Side) O RDER This criminal original petition has been filed against the impugned charge sheet in S.T.C.No.107 of 2020 on the file of the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Vedasandur.

2.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submitted that now the prosecution has been withdrawn by the respondent and it was dismissed as withdrawn on 14.12.2022.

3.Recording the above said submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) this criminal original petition is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Index : Yes/No 22.12.2022 Internet : Yes/No 2/4

TM Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned. To 1.The Inspector of Police, Vedasandur Police Station, Dindigul District.

2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

3/4

G.ILANGOVAN. J.

TM 22.12.2022 4/4