← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/14322/2017dismissed for nonprosecution

M.Ravi v. The Superintendent Of Police

2021-02-12Honourable Mr Justice G.Ilangovan2 pages

W.P.(MD).No.14322 of 2017 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 12.02.2021

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN W.P.(MD).No.14322 of 2017 M.Ravi ... Petitioner -Vs1. The Superintendent of Police, Superintendent Office, Pudukkottai District.

2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Deputy Superintendent Office, Aranthagi Taluk, Pudukkottai District.

3. The Inspector of Police, Aranthangi Police Station, Arnathangi Taluk, Pudukkottai District.

4. Palanivel

5. Duraisamy

6. Arumugam

7. N.Boominathan ... Respondents (R4 to R7 are impleaded vide Court order dated 05.09.2017 in WMP(MD)No.13167 of 2017) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the third respondent to conduct enquiry based on the petitioner's representation dated 03.01.2017.

For Petitioner : No appearance For R1 to R3 : Mr.M.Ganesan Government Advocate (Criminal Side)

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed for seeking a direction to direct the third respondent to conduct enquiry based on the petitioner's representation dated 03.01.2017. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

W.P.(MD).No.14322 of 2017 2.When the matter was taken up for hearing on 06.01.2021, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, the matter was adjourned to 29.01.2021, and on that day also, there was no presentation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, the matter was posted under the caption 'for dismissal' on 12.02.2021. 3.Even today ((i.e on 12.02.2021), there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CO) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) DSS Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

To

1. The Superintendent of Police, Superintendent Office, Pudukkottai District.

2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Deputy Superintendent Office, Aranthagi Taluk, Pudukkottai District.

3. The Inspector of Police, Aranthangi Police Station, Arnathangi Taluk, Pudukkottai District.

Order made in W.P.(MD).No.14322 of 2017 12.02.2021 KUN(CO) SRS (01/03/2021) 2P : 4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2