Sami, S/O.Madasamy, v. The District Collector

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 26.04.2023

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI Sami ... Petitioner versus

1. The District Collector, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar.

2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sattur, Virudhunagar District.

3. The Tahsildar, Rajapalayam Taluk, Virudhunagar District.

4. The Village Administrative Officer, North Devathanam Village, Virudhunagar District.

5. The Inspector of Police, Seithur Police Station, Virudhunagar District.

6. Vanaraj ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, 1/4

seeking for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents 1 to 5 herein to take action against the Kattapanchayatdars, North Devathanam Village, Rajapalayam Taluk, Virudhunagar District within the stipulated period.

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Jothi Basu For R1 to R5 : Mr.M.Sarangan, Additional Govt. Pleader

ORDER

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the prayer sought for in the writ petition has become infructuous. Therefore, he seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.

2. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.

26.04.2023 ogy NCC : Yes / No.

Index : Yes / No.

Internet : Yes / No.

2/4

To

1. The District Collector, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar.

2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sattur, Virudhunagar District.

3. The Tahsildar, Rajapalayam Taluk, Virudhunagar District.

4. The Village Administrative Officer, North Devathanam Village, Virudhunagar District.

5. The Inspector of Police, Seithur Police Station, Virudhunagar District.

3/4

B.PUGALENDHI, J.

ogy 26.04.2023 4/4