← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/1515/2017dismissed

Janakiraman, v. The Executive Engineer

2020-07-24Honourable Mr Justice G.R.Swaminathan2 pages

W.P.(MD).No.1515 of 2017 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 24.07.2020

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN W.P.(MD).No.1515 of 2017 and W.M.P.(MD).No.1232 of 2017 1.Janakiraman 2.Kothanda Pani

...Petitioners

Vs.

1.The Executive Engineer, TNEB (O & M), Manapparai Division, Trichy District.

2.The Assistant Engineer, TNEB (O & M), Nadupatti Village, Manapparai Taluk, Trichy District.

3.Thangavel

...Respondents

PRAYER : Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for records with respect to the second respondent proceeding in Ka.No.2B.Po/K.Ka/M.Path/Koo.K/Ma.No.74/15.16 dated 04.03.2016 and quash the same to direct the second respondent to conduct the enquiry by considering the objection of the obtaining of the petitioner.

For Petitioners : Mr.N.R.Balaji For R-1 & R-2 : Mr.M.Rajeswari for Mr.S.M.S.Johny Basha

ORDER

None appears for the writ petitioners.

2.What is under challenge is the communication dated 04.03.2016 issued by the second respondent. I went through the contents of the said communication. It merely reads that the Authority has not received any application for grant of service connection to the houses of the named respondents. I fail to understand as to what is there to challenge in this communication. That apart it is a reply sent to the petitioner's counsel in response to his letter dated 25.02.2016. There is nothing to interfere with the impugned communication. Leaving open the rights of the parties, the writ https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

W.P.(MD).No.1515 of 2017 petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar // True Copy // / /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) Tsg Note:

In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

ORDER MADE IN W.P.(MD).No.1515 of 2017 24.07.2020 AP (31.07.2020) 2P-1C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2