← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/15603/2017dismissed for not pressed

T.Aathimuthu Arumainayagam v. The Chief Educational Officer

2022-08-08Honourable Mr Justice G. Chandrasekharan5 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 08.08.2022

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G. CHANDRASEKHARAN W.P(MD).No.15603 of 2017 and W.M.P(MD).Nos.12326 and 12327 of 2017 T.Aathimuthu Arumainayagam, : Petitioner Vs

1. The Chief Educational Officer, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi.

2. The District Educational Officer, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi

3. The Correspondent, TDDA, Abiseganathar Higher Secondary School, Kulaiyankarisal, Thoothukudi District - 628 103.

4. The Correspondent, Karukalperi Higher Secondary School, Aasirvathapuram, Thoothukudi District

5. God Pray David, 1/5

6. The Correspondent, St.Ignetius Higher Secondary School, Innaciapuram, Thoothukudi District.

: Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the proceedings of the first respondent in Na.Ka.No. 6306/M3/2015, dated 06.04.2017 and quash the same and further directing the first respondent to deploy the fifth respondent in the BT Assistant (tamil) Post.

For Petitioner : M/s.G.Prabhu Rajadurai, ` For R1 and R2 : Mr.A.Kannan Additional Government Pleader For R3 and R6 : No appearance For R4 and R5 : Mr.J.Ashok

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed in the nature of Certiorarified Mandamus, seeking to quash the proceedings of the first respondent in Na.Ka.No. 6306/M3/2015, dated 06.04.2017 and consequently, to directthe first respondent to deploy the fifth respondent in the BT Assistant (tamil) 2/5

Post.

2.When the matter is taken up for hearing today, Mr.J.Ashok, learned Counsel appearing for the respondents 4 and 5 submitted that the petitioner sent a letter to the District Chief Education Officer, Thuthukudi, stating that he is getting full salary and now, working at Antoniyar Higher Secondary School. Therefore, he wants to terminate the proceedings in W.P(MD)No. 15063 of 2017.

3.The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that he is not able to contact the petitioner and he has no instruction from the petitioner. 4.When the matter is taken up for hearing on 05.08.2022, the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner made the same representation and he sought time for getting instructions from the petitioner with regard to the letter sent by the petitioner to the Chief Educational Officer. 5.In the light of the submission made by the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and the production of original letter submitted by the 3/5

petitioner along with the letter of the Chief Education Officer, Thoothukudi, this Court comes to the conclusion that the petitioner does not want to proceed with this petition and he wants to terminate the proceedings in this petition. Therefore, this writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 08.08.2022 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No lr To

1. The Chief Educational Officer, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi.

2. The District Educational Officer, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi 4/5

G. CHANDRASEKHARAN , J.

lr W.P(MD).No.15603 of 2017 08.08.2022 5/5