Madras High CourtCONT P(MD)/42/2018closed

P.Perumal, v. Chandrasekar,

2020-11-24Honourable Mr Justice N. Kirubakaran,Honourable Mr Justice B.Pugalendhi2 pages

Cont.P.(MD)No.42 of 2018 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 24.11.2020

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.KIRUBAKARAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI Cont.P.(MD)No.42 of 2018 in W.P.(MD)No.5091 of 2017 P.Perumal : Petitioner/Petitioner Vs.

Chandrasekar, Tahsildar, Thuraiyur Taluk, Trichy District.

: Contemnor/2nd Respondent PRAYER: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act, to punish the respondent herein for committing grave contempt and wilful disobedience of the order passed by this Court in W.P.(MD)No.5091 of 2017 dated 23.03.2017.

Prayer in WP(MD)No.5091/ 2017 :

Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a WRIT OF MANDAMUS directing the 1st respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 14.03.2017 and Surveying the land in Survey No.338/10, New Survey No.395/86 at Naduvalore Village, Keela Naduvalore Post, Thuraiyoor Taluk, Trichy District.

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Muthusamy For Respondent : Mr. Sreecharan Rangarajan, Additional Advocate General Assisted by Mr.VR.Shanmuganathan, Special Government Pleader *****

O R D E R

(Order of the Court was made by N.KIRUBAKARAN, J.) The order passed by this Court in W.P.(MD)No.5091 of 2017, dated 23.03.2017, has been complied with by passing order dated 20.03.2019 in Na.Ka.Aa1/8625/18 by the second respondent and a copy of the same has been produced before this Court by the learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the respondents. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

Cont.P.(MD)No.42 of 2018 2.In view of the same, no further order is necessary in this Contempt Petition and same is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-I) // True Copy // / /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) sj/ias Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned. To The Tahsildar, Thuraiyur Taluk, Trichy District.

Cont.P.(MD)No.42 of 2018 in W.P.(MD)No.5091 of 2017 24.11.2020 SGS(CO) CS(09.12.2020) 2P 2C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2