← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/16455/2017closed

M/S.Sri Vinayaga Aqua v. The Government Of Tamil Nadu

2021-12-02Honourable Mr Justice M. Sundar3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 02.12.2021

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR and W.M.P(MD).Nos.13112 and 13113 of 2017 M/s.Sri Vinayaga Aqua, Rep. by its Proprietor : Petitioner Vs.

1. The Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary, Public Works (R2) Department, St.Fort George, Chennai - 600 009.

2. The Central Ground Water Board, Government of India, Ministry of Water Resources, South Eastern Coastal Region, Rep. by its Regional Director, E-1, G-Block, Rajaji Bhavan, Besant Nagar, Chennai - 600 090.

3. The Chief Engineer, Public Works Department, Water Resources Organization, State Ground and Surface Water Resources Data Centre, Taramani, Chennai - 600 113.

4. The Director (Enforcement), Food Safety and Standards Authority of India, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, FDA Bhawan, Kotla Road, New Delhi - 110 002.

5. The District Collector, Madurai, Madurai District.

6. The Designated Officer, Food Safety Wing, Department of Food Safety and Drug Administration, 1/3

7. The District Environmental Engineer, Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board, Madurai.

8. The Executive Officer, Paravai Town Panchayat, : Respondents P RAYER:

Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records pertaining to the impugned G.O.Ms.No.142, Public Works (R2) Department, dated 23.07.2014 issued by the first respondent, quash the same.

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Suresh Manickam for M/s.R.J.Karthick For Respondents : Mr.T.Amjadkhan, Government Advocate for R3,R5 to R7 Mr.P.Subbiah for R2 No Appearance for R1 and R8

O R D E R

******************** Mr.S.Suresh Manickam, learned counsel representing the counsel on record for the lone writ petitioner and Mr.Amjadkhan, learned Government Advocate on behalf of respondents 3, 5 to 7 and Mr.P.Subbiah, learned counsel representing the counsel on record for second respondent are before this Court. There is no representation for respondents 1 and 8 but that is not of any significance as learned counsel representing the counsel on record for writ petitioner submits that the captioned writ petition has become infructuous and the same can be disposed of as closed.

2. Recording the stated position of the writ petitioner, captioned writ petition is disposed of as closed. Though obvious, I make it clear that I have not expressed any view or opinion on the merits of the matter. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected W.M.Ps are disposed of as closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-I) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) pkn 2/3

To

1. The Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu, Public Works (R2) Department, St.Fort George, Chennai - 600 009.

2. The Regional Director, Central Ground Water Board, Government of India, Ministry of Water Resources, South Eastern Coastal Region, E-1, G-Block, Rajaji Bhavan, Besant Nagar, Chennai - 600 090.

3. The Chief Engineer, Public Works Department, Water Resources Organization, State Ground and Surface Water Resources Data Centre, Taramani, Chennai - 600 113.

4. The Director (Enforcement), Food Safety and Standards Authority of India, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, FDA Bhawan, Kotla Road, New Delhi - 110 002.

5. The District Collector, Madurai, Madurai District.

6. The Designated Officer, Food Safety Wing, Department of Food Safety and Drug Administration,

7. The District Environmental Engineer, Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board, Madurai.

8. The Executive Officer, Paravai Town Panchayat, +1 CC to M/s.SPL GP ( SR-37194[F] dated 03/12/2021 ) +1 CC to M/s.P.SUBBIAH, Advocate ( SR-37120[F] dated 02/12/2021 ) 02.12.2021 RK(10/12/2021) 3P 11C 3/3