← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/22042/2022ordered

Chinnasamy v. The Inspector Of Police

2022-12-14Honourable Mr Justice A.D.Jagadish Chandira3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 14/12/2022 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA CRL OP(MD). No.22042 of 2022

1. Chinnasamy

2. Boomiraj

3. Kannammal @ Pichayi

4. KS Subramaniyan

5. Eswaran ... Petitioners/Accused No.1 to 5 Vs State rep.by The Inspector of Police, Vaiyampatty Police Station, Trichy District.

(Crime No.387/2022).

... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioners : M/s.Ramsundarvijayaraj.S, Advocate For Respondent : Mr.P.Kottai Chamy, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.387/2022 on the file of the Respondent Police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioners/Accused, apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 147, 294(b), 323, 506(i) of I.P.C, in Crime No.387 of 2022, on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution as per the defacto complainant is that since there was property dispute between the parties, as directed by A4, who promised to compromise the dispute peacefully, the defacto complainant went to the occurrence place on 25.11.2022.

At that time, all the accused persons, formed into an unlawful assembly, abused and assaulted him. Hence, the complaint. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent and a false case was foisted against them, since there was a property dispute between the parties. The injured was discharged from the hospital, since the injuries were simple in nature. Hence, prays to release them on anticipatory bail. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that in this case, though the injuries were simple in nature and the injured was discharged from the hospital, the accused persons abused and assaulted the defacto complainant. Hence, prays to dismiss the petition.

5.Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the materials placed before this Court. 6.Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the fact that the injured sustained simple injuries only, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.

7.Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed and the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Manaparai, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that:

(a)the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the learned Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or bank pass book to ensure their identity;

(b)the petitioners shall report before the respondent Police daily at 10:30 a.m., for a period of four weeks, thereafter, on every Saturday at 10:30 a.m., until further orders; (c)the petitioners shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; (d)the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

(e)on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action

against the petitioners in accordance with law, as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and;

(f)if the accused/ petitioners thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

Sd/- 14/12/2022 / TRUE COPY / /12/2022 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.IV) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

PNM TO

1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MANAPARAI.

2. -DO- THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TRICHY DISTRICT.

3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VAIYAMPATTY POLICE STATION, TRICHY DISTRICT.

4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.RAMSUNDARVIJAYARAJ.S Advocate SR.No.14846

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.22042 of 2022 Date :14/12/2022 SP/SSS/SAR IV/22/12/2022/3P/6C