Madras High CourtCONT P(MD)/1801/2018closed

R.Thennarasi, v. G.Sujitha,

2019-08-05Honourable Mr Justice R. Suresh Kumar2 pages

Cont. P(MD) No.1801 of 2018 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 05.08.2019

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR CONT.P.(MD)No.1801 of 2018 R.Thennarasi ... Petitioner -VsG.Sujitha The public Information Officer/ The Assistant Registrar, Manonmaniam Sundaranar University, Abishekapatti, Tirunelveli - 627 102.

... Respondent Prayer: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the respondent for willful contempt of the order of this Court dated 17.11.2017 made in W.P.(MD) No.21194 of 2017.

Prayer in WP(MD). 21194/ 2017 :

Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court To issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondents 2 and 3 to provide information sought for by the Petitioner vide her letter dated 15.06.2016. For Petitioner : Ms.D.Geetha For Respondent : Mr.Md.Atiff for M/s.Ajmal Associates

ORDER

This contempt petition has been filed for the alleged disobedience of the orders of this Court dated 17.11.2017 made in W.P.(MD) No.21194 of 2017. By the said order, this Court directed the 3rd respondent to furnish some information to the petitioner as directed by the 1st respondent.

2.Today, when this contempt petition is taken up for final disposal, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent herein submitted that the information has already been furnished to the petitioner by communication dated 12.01.2016 and 25.02.2016 and since, the orders of this Court has been complied with, the question of contempt does not arise.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

Cont. P(MD) No.1801 of 2018 3.However, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner wants to verify the same.

4.Now, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent herein produced the aforesaid communication as the compliance of the order hence, this Court feels that, at this juncture, this contempt proceedings cannot be proceeded further against the respondent herein.

5.In that view of the matter, this contempt petition is closed. However, it is open to the petitioner to verify with the information already furnished and still, he is facing any grievance, he can work out his remedy in the manner known to law.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar // True Copy // Sub Assistant Registrar(CS ) +1 CC to M/s.AJMAL ASSOCIATES, Advocate SR-80060. +1 CC to M/s.D.GEETHA, Advocate SR-80380.

Order made in CONT.P.(MD)No.1801 of 2018 05.08.2019 CS(22.08.2019) 2P 3C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2