Duraisamy, S/O.Palaniyandi, v. The District Collector,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 24.09.2024

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE Ms.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA and W.M.P.(MD) No.15822 of 2017 1.Duraisamy 2.Angamuthu ... Petitioners /vs./ 1.The District Collector, Trichy District, Trichy.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Lalgudi, Trichy District.

3.The Tahsildar, Lalgudi, Trichy District.

4.C.Mohan 5.Kalaimaghal Sabha represented by its President, 1/5

6.K.Balakrishnan 7.P.Subramanian 8.A.Dhanapalan 9.Rani 10.Radha @ Gunasundari 11.Anandhi @ Anbuselvi 12.Geetha (R10 to R12 have been impleaded vide order dated 24.01.2023) ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned order in A3/4217-2013 dated 12.03.2015 passed by the 2nd respondent and quash the same and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to issue patta in favour of the petitioners in S.No.308/4, situated at Periakurugai Village, Lalgudi Taluk, Trichy District.

For Petitioners : Mr.T.Selvakumaran For R1 to R3 : Mr.B.Saravanan Additional Government Pleader For R5 : Mr.Abarar MD.Abdullah 2/5

For R8 : Mr.S.Deenadhayalan For R4, R6 & R7 : No appearance

ORDER

The above writ petition has been filed for the issue of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to quash the order passed in A3/4217-2013 dated 12.03.2015 by the second respondent and to direct the second respondent to issue patta in favour of the petitioners in S.No.308/4, situated at Periakurugai Village, Lalgudi Taluk, Trichy District.

2. In W.P.(MD) No.16791 of 2013 (Dhanapal Vs. The Sub Registrar, Chettikulam, Tiruchirappalli District and others) dated 07.11.2022, which was filed by the 8th respondent herein with reference to the very same survey number and the petitioners herein had been arrayed as respondents 2 and 3, the learned Judge had confirmed the sale in favour of the writ petitioner by allowing the writ petition and taking note of the dismissal of the suit filed by the respondents 2 and 3, the learned Judge has also directed the respondents 2 to 4 therein, which includes the petitioner herein, to seek the remedy before the competent Civil 3/5

Court. The said order inures to this writ petition as well, since the property in question is the very same property.

3. Therefore, the Writ Petition stands dismissed in the light of the order passed in W.P.(MD) No.16791 of 2013 (referred supra). No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

Speaking : Yes / No 24.09.2024 NCC : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Index : Yes / No mm To 1.The District Collector, Trichy District, Trichy.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Lalgudi, Trichy District.

3.The Tahsildar, Lalgudi, Trichy District.

4/5

P.T.ASHA, J.

mm 24.09.2024 5/5