← Library
Madras High CourtWP Crl.(MD)/1330/2025dismissed

Muthukani v. The Deputy Inspector General Of Prison

2025-09-12Honourable Mr Justice P.Velmurugan,Honourable Mrs Justice L.Victoria Gowri4 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 12.09.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN AND THE HONOURABLE Mrs. JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI WP Crl. (MD). No.1330 of 2025 Muthukani ... Petitioner Vs

1. The Deputy Inspector General of Prison, Madurai Zone, Madurai 625 016.

2. The Superintendent of Prison,, Central Prison, Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli 627 007.

3. The State of Tamil Nadu,, Rep. by the Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi District, District Police Headquarters, Thoothukudi..

4. The Inspector of Police,, Sipcot Police Station, Madatur, Thoothukudi.

... Respondents 1/4

PRAYER :-Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to grant ordinary leave for 3 months without escort for treatment to the detenue, Murugesan, S/o.Mariappan bearing PID. No. 220843, serving life sentence at Palayamkottai Central Prison by considering the representation send by the petitioner dated 11.08.2025. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Narayanan For Respondents : Mr.B.Nambiselvan Addl. Public Prosecutor

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by P.VELMURUGAN,J.) The writ petition has been filed for a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents to grant ordinary leave for 3 months without escort for treatment to the detenu, Murugesan, S/o.Mariappan bearing PID. No. 220843, serving life sentence at Palayamkottai Central Prison by considering the representation of the petitioner dated 11.08.2025.

2. When the writ petition is taken up for hearing, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the representation of the petitioner has been considered and the 1st respondent has rejected the same on 10.09.2025.

2/4

3. In view of the above, since the 1st respondent has already considered and rejected the representation of the petitioner seeking ordinary leave for three months on 10.09.2025, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. However, the petitioner is at liberty to work out her remedy in the manner known to law, if she is aggrieved by the rejection order.

[P.V.,J] [L.V.G.,J] 12.09.2025 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No RR To

1. The Deputy Inspector General of Prison, Madurai Zone, Madurai 625 016.

2. The Superintendent of Prison,, Central Prison, Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli 627 007.

3. The Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi District, District Police Headquarters, Thoothukudi..

4. The Inspector of Police,, Sipcot Police Station, Madatur, Thoothukudi.

5.The Additional Public Prosecutor Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

3/4

P.VELMURUGAN, J.

AND L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.

RR

ORDER

IN WP CRL.(MD) No.1330 of 2025 Date : 12.09.2025 4/4