S.Kadarkarai v. The Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 02/11/2023 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V. SIVAGNANAM S.Kadarkarai, ... Petitioner/Sole Accused Vs State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Puliyangudi Police Station, Tenkasi District.
Crime No. 410/2023.
... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : G.Kalidoss, Advocate.
For Respondent : Mrs.M.Aasha, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.439 of Cr.P.C.
PRAYER :- C-58B. For Bail in Crime No. 410 of 2023 on the file of the respondent police. 1/5
ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner/ accused, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 02.10.2023 for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 9(1) (m) r/w. 10 of Protection of Children From Sexual Offences Act, 2012 and us/. 506(ii0 IPC in Crime No.410 of 2023, on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner herein caught holds the victim girl from her back side and squeezing her both breasts. Thereafter, one day, when the victim girl was alone at her house, he came there and called the victim girl by showing signal. Hence, the case.
3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that due to previous motive, the petitioner herein rope into the case and he is innocent and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and his name has been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that the petitioner is in jail from 02.10.2023 and hence, he seeks bail.
4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent 2/5
submitted that it is a case of love affair and there is no previous case pending against the petitioner and the investigation of the case is pending.
5. Considering the nature of allegations made against the petitioner and also considering the period of incarceration and also taking into consideration of the principle stated by the Honourable Supreme Court in Sanjay Chandra and others vs. CBI reported in (2012)1 SCC 40 and the nature of the offence alleged by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on condition to execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Sessions Special Court for POCSO Act Cases, Thirunelveli and on further conditions that:
(i) the petitioner shall affix his photograph and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar Card or Bank Pass Book to ensure their identity.
(ii) the petitioner shall appear before the trial Court once in week i.e., on every Monday at 10.30 am until further orders.
3/5
(iii)the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness; (iv)the petitioner shall not abscond during trial. (v) On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. vi)If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.
sd/- 02/11/2023 / TRUE COPY / 02/11/2023 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TRP 4/5
TO
1. The Sessions Special Court for POCSO Act Cases, Thirunelveli
2. The Superintendent, Central Prison, Palayamkottai, Thirunelveli District.
3. The Inspector of Police, Puliyangudi Police Station, Tenkasi District.
4. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
+1 CC to M/s.G.KALIDOSS, Advocate ( SR-15808[I] dated 02/11/2023 )
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.19615 of 2023 Date :02/11/2023 SSA/02.11.2023/5P/6C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023 5/5