Valli, W/O.Uthiriyanathan, v. The Revenue Divisional Officer

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 09.09.2024

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA W.M.P(MD)Nos.15846 of 2017 and 24354 of 2023 Valli ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sivagangi Taluk, 2.The Tahsildar, Sivagangai Taluk, Sivagangai Distirct.

3.Muthurakku 4.Kalidass 5.T.Kalimuthu 6.Yuvarani .. Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, call for records from the 1st respondent in his proceedings in Na.Ka.A3/1659/15 dated 09.10.2017 and quash the same and consequently, forbearing the 1st respondent from in anyway made any entry or alterations in the patta

stands in the name of the petitioner and her family members in respect of their property in S.No.101/1, patta No.730, Kanjirangal Group, Sivagangai Taluk, Sivagangai District.

For Petitioner :

Mr.N.Sathish Babu For R1 & R2 :

Mr.P.Thambidurai Government Advocate For R3 & R4 :

Mr.P.Venkatesan For R5 & R6 :

Mr.G.Prabhu Rajadurai

ORDER

This writ petition is filed challenging the proceedings of the first respondent issued in Na.Ka.A3/1659/15 dated 09.10.2017 and quash the same and consequently to forbear the first respondent from in anyway making any entry or alterations in the patta which stands in the name of the petitioner and her family members, in respect of their property in S.No.101/1, patta No.730, Kanjirangal Group, Sivagangai Taluk, 2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Government Advocate appearing for the first and second respondents, learned counsel appearing for the third and fourth respondents and the learned counsel appearing for the fifth and sixth respondents.

3.This writ petition is filed merely based on an enquiry notice and hence, a writ would not lie against the same. That apart, third parties have claimed a right to the property as well, therefore, the same is not maintainable.

4.In view of the above, this Writ Petition is dismissed. However, this Court directs the Revenue Divisional Officer to issue notice to the petitioner, the respondents 3 to 6 and the interested parties if any, and hear the parties and thereafter pass an order within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 09.09.2024 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes Ns To 1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sivagangi Taluk, 2.The Tahsildar, Sivagangai Taluk, Sivagangai Distirct.

P.T.ASHA, J.

Ns W.M.P(MD)Nos.15846 of 2017 and 24354 of 2023 Dated: 09.09.2024