A.Kanagaraj, S/O.A.Arumugam v. The Management Of

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 14.06.2023

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY A.Kanagaraj ... Petitioner vs.

1.The Management of Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Limited, represented by its Managing Director, Kumbakonam.

2.The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Limited, Trichy Region, Trichy.

3.The Assistant Manager (Accounts & Audit), Pension Section, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Limited, Trichy Region, Trichy.

1/5

4.The Administrator, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Pension Fund Trust, Thiruvalluvar Illam, Pallavan Salai, Chennai-2.

... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order of the 3rd respondent in Ref.No.Tha.Aa.Po.Ka/Trichy/Oivoothiyam/PS1/0904/17, dated 25.09.2017, to quash the same and consequently, to direct the respondents to pay the petitioner's monthly pension, commuted value of pension, gratuity, earned leave salary, Employees Social Protection Scheme amount with interest at 18% per annum after making deduction of management's provident fund contribution payable by the petitioner to the 1st respondent corporation within a time frame that may be fixed by this Court.

For Petitioner : Mr.A.Rahul For Respondents : Mr.D.Sivaraman 2/5

O R D E R

This writ petition is filed for writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to quash the impugned order, dated 25.09.2017 and to direct the respondents to forbear the respondents from insisting of employees contribution in order to pay pension.

2. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that the petitioner has paid the employee contribution along with interest. Now, the amount is transferred to the Pension Trust and the petitioner is receiving pension. However, the learned Standing Counsel further submitted that he has no instructions whether the arrears have been paid.

3. Therefore, this Court is of the considered opinion if the arrears is not paid, the same shall be paid at the earliest. For the reasons stated 3/5

above the writ petition is closed. No costs. Index : Yes / No 14.06.2023 Internet : Yes NCC : Yes / No Tmg 4/5

S.SRIMATHY, J Tmg 14.06.2023 5/5