Mr.K.Kanthaiah, v. Mr.Mohamed Ithris,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 26.10.2016

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE Ms.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI CONT P(MD)No.1213 of 2016 Mr.K.Kanthaiah ... Petitioner/Defacto Complainant Vs Mr.Mohamed Ithris, Inspector of Police, K.Pudhupatti Police Station, Thirumayam Taluk, Pudukkottai District.

... Respondent/Respondent Prayer : Petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the Respondent for his willful, deliberate and intentional false information given before this Hon'ble Court in Crl.O.P(MD)No.13412 of 2016, dated 01.08.2016 and pass such further or other orders as this hOn'ble Court. Prayer in CRL OP(MD). 13412/ 2016 :

For Anticipatory Bail in Cr.No.114 of 2016 on the file of the Respondent Police.

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Baalasundharam For Respondent : Mr.P.Kannithevan Govt. Advocate

O R D E R

This contempt petition has been filed to punish the Respondent for his willful, deliberate and intentional false information given before this Court in Crl.O.P(MD)No.13412 of 2016, dated 01.08.2016.

2.According to the petitioner, on the date of passing order, the injured person was taking treatment as Inpatient and the respondent police has given a false information to the Government Advocate (Crl.side) that the injured person has been discharged from the hospital. In the circumstances, he has come out with this petition to punish the respondent.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 3.The learned counsel for the respondent submitted that on the date of hearing the counsel for the petitioner submitted before

this Court that the accused persons were attacked the petitioner with hands and threatening him with dire consequences. He submitted that there is no serious injury. Considering the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and his submission that there is no serious injury, this Court granted anticipatory bail to the accused. There is no misrepresentation made before this Court.

4.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the respondent.

5.From the records, it is seen that the petitioner was attacked by the accused persons with hands and threatened him with dire consequences. There is no serious injury caused to the petitioner and the respondent police has not given false information to the Government Advocate (Crl.side) and only by typographical error instead of typing as simple injury is caused, it has been typed as injured person discharged from the hospital. 6.In view of the same, the contempt petition is dismissed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CO) /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To Mr.Mohamed Ithris, Inspector of Police, K.Pudhupatti Police Station, Thirumayam Taluk,Pudukkottai District.

+1 cc to M/s.K.Baalasundharam, Advocate in SR.No.63717/2016 am CSL/GSV-PM/28.11.2016 :2P/3C CONT P(MD)No.1213 of 2016 26.10.2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/