← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/20147/2017closed

Videyal Veeraperumal v. The Assistant Director Of

2022-09-13Honourable Mr Justice R. Mahadevan,Honourable Mr Justice J.Sathya Narayana Prasad4 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 13.09.2022

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD W.P(MD)No.20147 of 2017 Videyal Veeraperumal ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Assistant Director of Panchayats, Office of the Assistant Director Panchayat, 2.The District Collector, Office of the District Collector, 3.The Tasildar, Sivakasi Taluk, 4.The Block Development Officer, Sivakasi Block Development Office, 5.The Proprietor, Rajco Company, 280-B, Opp. To Palaniandavar Theater, Gnagiri Road, Sivakasi, Virudhunagar District - 626 123.

6.The Proprietor, JC Mineral Water, 1/4

745/1, Gnagiri Road, Sivakasi, Virudhunagar District - 626 123.

7.The Superintending of Engineer, Public Works Department, 8.The Superintending of Engineer, Tamil Nadu Water and Drainage Department, ... Respondents (R7 & R8 are impleaded vide Court order dated 05.12.2017 in W.M.P.(MD) No.16961 of 2017) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to directing the respondent No.4 to take action on the basis of the letter in O.Mu.vu.e6/1467/2017 dated 21.09.2017 communicated by the Respondent No.1 in accordance with law within the time stipulated by this Hon'ble Court.

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Alagumani For Respondents 1 to 3 & 7: Mr.G.V.Vairam Santhosh Additional Government Pleader For 4th Respondent : Mr.Alaguthevan For 5th Respondent : Mr.R.Devaraj For 6th Respondent : Mr.N.Dilip Kumar For 8th Respondent : Mr.B.Vijay Karthikeyan * * * 2/4

O R D E R

(Order of the Court was made by R.MAHADEVAN, J.) The petitioner has come forward with this writ petition praying to issue a writ of mandamus, directing the respondent No.4 to take action on the basis of the letter in O.Mu.vu.e6/1467/2017 dated 21.09.2017 communicated by the Respondent No.1 in accordance with law within a time frame.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty to approach the concerned authority with adequate fresh material. 3.

Granting such liberty, the Writ Petition is closed. No costs.

[R.M.D., J.] [J.S.N.P., J.] 13.09.2022 Internet : Yes / No Index : Yes / No sj To 1.The Assistant Director of Panchayats, Office of the Assistant Director Panchayat, 3/4

R.MAHADEVAN, J.

and J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD , J.

sj 2.The District Collector, Office of the District Collector, 3.The Tasildar, Sivakasi Taluk, 4.The Superintending Engineer, Public Works Department, W.P(MD)No.20147 of 2017 13.09.2022 4/4