Madras High CourtCRL MP(MD)/12310/2025dismissed

Tharmar v. Shanmugaraj @ Shanmugam

2025-09-12Honourable Mrs Justice S.Srimathy4 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 12/09/2025 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY CRL MP(MD).No.12310 of 2025 in CRL OP(MD). No.11979 of 2025 Tharmar ... Petitioner/Accused Vs

1. Shamugaraj @ Shanmugam

2. The State of Tamil Nadu Rep.By, the Sub Inspector of Police, Tirunelveli Taluk Police Station, Tirunelveli District.

(Crime No.494 of 2025) ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.A.Anto Michael Joe Advocate.

For R1 : Mr.R.Muthuram For R2 : Mr.S.S.Manokj Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR CANCELLATION OF ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.483(3) of BNSS 1/4

PRAYER :- This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed under Section 483(3) of BNSS, to cancel the anticipatory bail granted in favour of the 1st respondent in Crl.OP(MD).No.11979 of 2025 dated 23.07.2025. ORDER : The Court made the following order :- This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed seeking to cancel the anticipatory bail granted to the 1st respondent in Crl.O.P.No. 11979 of 2025 dated 23.07.2025 by this Court.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner/defacto complainant submitted that the 1st respondent/accused had threatened the petitioner/defacto complainant and not following the conditions imposed by this Court. Hence he prays for cancel the anticipatory bail to the 1st respondent.

3. The learned counsel for the 1st respondent submitted that the 1st respondent is regularly complying with the condition as imposed by this Court. He further submitted that the 1st respondent has not violated the condition as imposed by this Court. Hence, he prayed for dismissal of this petition.

2/4

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the second respondent submitted that the accused is complying with the condition..

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also the fact that the 1st respondent has not violated the condition as imposed by this Court. Hence, this Court does not find any ground to cancel the anticipatory bail granted in favour of the 1st respondent.

6. In view of the above, this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed.

(S S Y J) 12.09.2025 msrm To 1.The Sub Inspector of Police, Tirunelveli Taluk Police Station, Tirunelveli District.

2. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

3/4

S.SRIMATHY,J msrm

ORDER

IN in CRL OP(MD).No.11979 of 2025 12.09.2025 4/4