P.Pandeeswaran, S/O.Pandi, v. The Tahsildar

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 08.02.2023

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY and W.M.P.(MD).Nos.18057 and 18058 of 2017 P.Pandeeswaran ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Tahsildhar, Nilakottai Taluk, Dindigul District.

2.The Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Nilakottai, Dindigul District.

... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the order passed by the first respondent in his proceedings in ROC.11804/2017/A2 dated 11.11.2017, quash the same consequently directing the first respondent to reinstate the petitioner in service with all attended and monetary benefits.

1/4

For Petitioner : Mr.S.M.Mohan Gandhi For R-1 : Mr.R.Suresh Kumar, Additional Government Pleader.

For R-2 : No Appearance

ORDER

This Writ Petition is filed challenging the suspension order.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that subsequently charge memo was issued and the petitioner had faced the disciplinary proceedings. However, he had submitted that he is not aware whether the subsistence allowance is paid for the suspension period.

3. The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the first respondent submitted that the subsistence allowance was paid for the suspension period.

2/4

4. Since the suspension cannot be challenged, moreover, it is stated that the petitioner is facing disciplinary proceedings which would indicate the suspension was evoked. Therefore, nothing survives for adjudication.

5. Hence, this Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 08.02.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No Nsr To The Tahsildhar, Nilakottai Taluk, Dindigul District.

3/4

S.SRIMATHY, J.

Nsr 08.02.2023 4/4