Madras High CourtWP(MD)/22144/2017dismissed as infructuous

S.Sujatha v. The Superintendent Of Police,

2021-02-26Honourable Mr Justice G.Ilangovan2 pages

W.P.(MD).No.22144 of 2017 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 26.02.2021

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN W.P.(MD).No.22144 of 2017 S.Sujatha ... Petitioner -Vs1.The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Idinthakarai Police Station, Tirunelveli District.

3.The District Educational Officer, Cherenmagadevi, Tirunelveli District.

4.The Bishop (Corporate Manager) Roman Catholic Diocese of Tuticorin, Catholic Bishop's House, Tuticorin.

5.The Correspondent, Bishop Roche Higher Secondary School, Idinthakarai, Tirunelveli District.

... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to consider the petitioner's representation dated 27.08.2016 for provide adequate protection for joining and discharge her duty at 5th respondent school based upon the appoint order in reference no APT/2016-2017/29 dated 16.08.2016, which issued by the 4th respondent.

For Petitioner : No Appearance For R1 to R3 : Mr.R.Anandharaj Additional Public Prosecutor For R4 & R5 : Mr.V.John Kennedy

ORDER

This petition has been filed for seeking a direction to direct the third respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 22.09.2017. Consequently, direct the respondents 1 and 2, to consider the petitioner's representation dated 27.08.2016, for provide adequate protection for joining and discharge her duty at 5th respondent school based upon the appointment order in Reference No.APT/2016-2017/29 dated 16.08.2016, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

W.P.(MD).No.22144 of 2017 which issued by the 4th respondent.

2.Inspite of repeated adjournments, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, the matter was listed today, under the caption 'for dismissal'. Even today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the respondents 4 and 5 would submit that this writ petition has been filed seeking police protection, on the basis of the petitioner's representation, for joining and discharge her duty, as a teacher at the fifth respondent's school and now, the petitioner has joined duty and discharging her duty.

4. It is seen that the matter has become infructuous and nothing survives for further adjudication in this petition.

5. In view of the above, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-I) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned. To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Idinthakarai Police Station, Tirunelveli District. 3.The District Educational Officer, Cherenmagadevi, Tirunelveli District.

+1 CC to M/s.FATHER XAVIER ASSOCIATES, Advocate ( SR-7731[F] dated 01/03/2021 ) W.P.(MD).No.22144 of 2017 26.02.2021 SSS(CO) KB(12.03.2021) 2P 5C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2