M/S.Subburaj Textile Mills Pvt v. The Superintending Engineer,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 19.06.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE and W.M.P.(MD) Nos.18523, 18524, 18531 and 18532 of 2017 For W.P(MD)No.22234 of 2017 M/s.Subburaj Spinning Mills Private Limited, represented by its Director R.Ragavan, HT SC No.177 & 187, Madurai Road, Sankar Nagar, Tirunelveli - 627 357.

... Petitioner Vs The Superintending Engineer, ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for records relating to the impugned order passed by the respondent in Lr.No.SE/TEDC/TIN/AO/REV/AAO/HT/AS/HT Sc.177/D.687/17 dated 10.11.2017 and Lr.No.SE/TEDC/TIN/AO/REV/AAO/HT/AS/HT Sc.187/D.691/17, dated 10.11.2017 and quash the same and further direct 1/5

the respondent to refund the security deposit available with the respondent along with eligible interest within the time as may be fixed by this Court.

For W.P(MD)No.22239 of 2017 M/s.Subburaj Spinning Mills Private Limited, represented by its Director R.Ragavan, HT SC No.177 & 187, Madurai Road, Sankar Nagar, Tirunelveli - 627 357.

... Petitioner Vs

1. The Director, Finance / TANGEDCO, NPKRR Maaligai, 144, Anna Salai, Chennai - 600 002.

2. The Superintending Engineer, ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the 1st respondent in Letter No.CFC/REV/FC/REV/AS.3/D.388-1/2017 dated 28.11.2017, quash the same and further direct the respondents to refund the excess security deposit of Rs.80,04,994/- lying with the 2nd respondent. 2/5

For Petitioner :

No appearance (for both petitions) For Respondents :

Mr.S.Deenadayalan (for both petitions) C O M M O N O R D E R [Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.] When the matter came up for hearing in the last occasion, there was no representation on the side of the petitioner and this Court directed to post the matter today, under the caption 'For Dismissal'. Even today, there is no representation for the petitioner. 2.In view of the same, these writ petitions stand dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. [S.M.S., J.] [A.D.M.C., J.] 19.06.2025 Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No NCC:Yes/No LR 3/5

To

1. The Director, Finance / TANGEDCO, NPKRR Maaligai, 144, Anna Salai, Chennai - 600 002.

2. The Superintending Engineer, 4/5

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.

and DR.A.D.MARIA CLETE, J.

LR 19.06.2025 5/5