Madras High CourtCONT P(MD)/904/2016closed

S.Jeyaraj,S/O.Sangili Gounder, v. Mr.D.S.Vincent,

2018-02-01Honourable Dr. Justice S. Vimala2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 01.02.2018

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE S.VIMALA Contempt Petition No.904 of 2016 in W.P.(MD)No.21239 of 2015 S.Jeyaraj ..Petitioner/Petitioner Vs.

D.S.Vincent, Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai) Ltd., Madurai.

.. Contemnor/2nd Respondent PRAYER: Contempt Petition filed under section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to initiate contempt proceedings against the contemnor/respondent and punish him for the willful disobedience of the order of this court in W.P(MD)No.21239 of 2015 dated 30.11.2015.

Prayer in WP(MD)No.21239/ 2015 :

Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents to settle retirement benefits of the petitioners leave salary with interest at the rate of 18% per annum from the date of his retirement to till the date of settlement within the time that may be stipulated by this Hon'ble Court and further directing the respondents to settle the interest at the reate of 18% per annum for the belated payment of gratuity, the commuted value of pension, social security scheme arrears amount within the time.

For Petitioner : Mr.A.Rahul For Respondents : Mr.AP.Muthupandian

O R D E R

The contempt petition has been filed to commit and punish the respondent for his willful disobedience of the order passed by this Court in W.P.(MD)No.21239 of 2015, dated 30.11.2015. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2. Heard Mr.A.Rahul, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.AP.Muthupandian, learned counsel for the contemnor.

3. The petitioner claims that interest for gratuity and leave salary, is not paid.

4. learned counsel for the contemnor on instructions would submit that the amount due and payable if any shall be calculated and paid to the petitioner, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. In case of noncompliance, the petitioner can revive the contempt petition.

5. Recording the above submission, this contempt petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to revive the contempt petition in case of non-compliance. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (Crl.side) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai) Ltd., Madurai.

PM TE/KK/SAR-4 : 02/03/2018 : 2P/2C Contempt Petition No.904 of 2016 in W.P.(MD)No.21239 of 2015 01.02.2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/