← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/26604/2023withdrawn dismissed

Subramanian .K v. The District Collector

2023-11-07Honourable Mr Justice M. Sundar,Honourable Mr.Justice R.Sakthivel6 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 07.11.2023 Coram THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR and THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL K.Subramanian .. Petitioner vs 1.The District Collector, Tiruchirappalli District, Tiruchirappalli.

2.The District Revenue Officer, Tiruchirappalli District, Tiruchirappalli.

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Srirangam Zone, Vannankovil, 4.The Tahsildar, Tahsildar Office, Kallupatti, Marungapuri, 5.The Block Development Officer, Kallupatti, Marungapuri, 1/6

6.The Panchayat President, Paluvanji, West Village, Paluvanji, Marunjapuri Circle, 7.A.Kadirvel 8.K.Jagadeesan .. Respondents Prayer:- Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 6 to remove the encroachment made in old Survey No.241/9, new Survey No.496/1 to the extent of 81.83 acres belongs to the Temple namely Thottiyam Chinammal Temple at West Paluvanji Village, Paluvanji, Marunjapuri Circle, Tiruchirappalli District made by 7th and 8th respondents on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 08.08.2023.

For Petitioner :

Mr.M.Ajmal Khan For Respondent Nos.1 to 5 :

Mr.P.Thilak Kumar Government Pleader 2/6

ORDER

[Order of the Court was made by M.SUNDAR, J.] When the matter was taken up, Mr.M.Ajmal Khan, learned counsel on record for petitioner, realized that he needed adequate instructions about the Temple, namely 'Thottiyam Chinammal Temple in West Paluvanji Village, Marunjapuri Circle, Tiruchirappalli District' [hereinafter 'said Temple' for the sake of convenience and clarity]. Therefore, learned counsel sought leave of this Court to withdraw the captioned 'Writ Petition' [hereinafter 'WP' for the sake of convenience] but made a plea to preserve all the rights and contentions of the petitioner and or any other person concerned with the matter to come to this Court with the same/similar prayer. Request for withdrawal acceded to.

2.Learned counsel has made an endorsement in the case file and a scanned reproduction of the same is as follows: 3/6

3.Captioned WP is disposed of as closed/withdrawn albeit preserving all the rights and contentions of the petitioner and or anyone concerned with this matter in the aforesaid manner. There shall be no order as to costs.

(M.S.,J.) (R.S.V.,J.) 07.11.2023 Index : Yes/No ps 4/6

To 1.The District Collector, Tiruchirappalli District, Tiruchirappalli.

2.The District Revenue Officer, Tiruchirappalli District, Tiruchirappalli.

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Srirangam Zone, Vannankovil, 4.The Tahsildar, Tahsildar Office, Kallupatti, Marungapuri, 5.The Block Development Officer, Kallupatti, Marungapuri, 6.The Panchayat President, Paluvanji, West Village, Paluvanji, Marunjapuri Circle, 5/6

M.SUNDAR, J., and R.SAKTHIVEL, J., ps 07.11.2023 6/6