Pushparajan v. The District Collector

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 28.08.2024 CORAM :

THE HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA For W.P(MD)No.24091 of 2017 Pushparajan ... Petitioner Vs 1/7

... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the first respondent in his proceedings in Na.Ka.C1/16231/2016, dated 23.08.2017 and quash the same as illegal.

For W.P(MD)No.24092 of 2017 M.Pandikumar ... Petitioner Vs 2/7

... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the first respondent in his proceedings in Na.Ka.C1/16210/2016, dated 22.08.2017 and quash the same as illegal.

For W.P(MD)No.24093 of 2017 Kadar Mydeen ... Petitioner Vs 3/7

... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the first respondent in his proceedings in Na.Ka.C1/16223/2016, dated 23.08.2017 and quash the same as illegal.

For Petitioner : Mr.M.A.M.Raja (in all cases) For R1 to R3 : Mr.D.S.Neduncheziyan Government Advocate (in all cases) For R4 : Mr.C.Arulvadivel Associates For S.Sankarapandian (in all cases) C O M M O N O R D E R These writ petitions have been filed seeking to quash the impugned orders passed by the first respondent in Na.Ka.C1/16231/2016, dated 23.08.2017, Na.Ka.C1/16210/2016, dated 22.08.2017 and Na.Ka.C1/16223/2016, dated 23.08.2017 respectively. 4/7

2.It is reported by the learned Government Advocate that pursuant to the orders of this Court in W.P(MD)No.14914 of 2020 and 24052 of 2018, the second respondent has refixed the value of the lands in the entire village. Therefore, nothing survives for adjudication. However, the petitioners before this Court are not a party to the proceedings before the second respondent and therefore, they have not been served with a copy of the award.

3.In the light of the above, the second respondent is directed to issue a copy of the award to the petitioners, within a period of two weeks, from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and the time for filing the appeal would start from the date on which, the copy of the award is issued to the petitioners.

4.Accordingly, these writ petitions stand dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

28.08.2024 Internet :Yes Index :Yes/No NCC :Yes/No LR 5/7

To 6/7

P.T.ASHA , J.

LR W.P(MD)Nos.24091, 24092 and 24093 of 2017 28.08.2024 7/7