Surya v. The State Of Tamil Nadu Rep.By

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 26.09.2025 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY CRL OP(MD). No.15146 of 2025 1.Surya 2.Kubendran ... Petitioners/ Accused Vs The State of Tamilnadu, Rep by the Inspector of Police, Pasupathipalayam Police Station, Karur District.

(Crime No.208 of 2025) ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioners : Mr.B.Santhanam Rajesh Kumar For Respondent : Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.483 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Bail in Crime No.208 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police.

1/6

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioners, who were arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 25.08.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 118(1), 126(2), 296(b), 351(3), 74, 79, 109(1) of BNS Act 2023 r/w Section 4 of TNPHW Act, in Crime No.208 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. seek bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that there was a wordy quarrel, the petitioners along with other accused persons have abused the defato complainant in filthy language and attacked the defacto complainant and his mother with stick and wooden log and caused injuries. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offences as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that the petitioners are ready and willing to abide by any conditions which may be imposed by this Court and they are in judicial custody from 25.08.2025. Hence, he seeks bail to the petitioners. 2/6

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the injured person has been discharged from the hospital and there is no previous case pending as against the petitioners. However, he opposed for grant of bail to the petitioners.

5. Taking into consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and also the fact that the injured person has been discharged from the hospital and also consideration the period of incarceration suffered by the petitioners, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners, subject to the following conditions:

6. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail on executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate Court No.1, Karur, Karur District, and on further conditions that :- [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

3/6

[b] the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. [c] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[d] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. [e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 BNS.

(S S Y J) 26.09.2025 msrm 4/6

To

1. The learned Judicial Magistrate Court No.1, Karur, Karur District.

2. The Superintendent, Sub Jail, Karur, Karur District.

3. The Inspector of Police, Pasupathipalayam Police Station, Karur District.

4. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

5/6

S.SRIMATHY,J.

msrm

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.15146 of 2025 Date : 26.09.2025 6/6