Shahul Ahmed v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 02.12.2016

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM Crl.O.P.(MD) No.13815 of 2013 1.Shahul Ahamed 2.Rajendran : Petitioners/Accused -vs1.State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by the Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Dindigul, Dindigul District. : 1st respondent/Complainant 2.Rajini Devi : 2nd respondent/De-facto complainant Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for the records pertaining to the case in Crime No.60 of 2011 on the file of the 1st respondent and quash the same.

For Petitioners : Mr.C.K.M.Appaji For 1st Respondent : Mr.K.Anbarasan Govt. Advocate (Crl.Side) For 2nd Respondent : Mr.A.Rajkumar Sen

O R D E R

This petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., praying to call for the records relating to the case in Crime No.60 of 2011 on the file of the 1st respondent police and quash the same.

2.When the matter was called on 28.11.2016, the petitioners/A1 and A2 and the 2nd respondent/de-facto complainant appeared in person with their respective counsel. They have filed a joint Memorandum of compromise stating that the matter has already been compromised between the parties and the de-facto complainant has no objection to quash the proceedings in Crime No.60 of 2011 as against the petitioners. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are willing to denote Rs.10,000/- each, to the Headmaster, Government Higher Secondary School, Alathur, Pattukottai.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 3.In view of the above, this court permitted the petitioners to pay Rs.10,000/- each to the Headmaster, Government Higher

Secondary School, Alathur, Pattukottai and also this court dispensed with the appearance of the parties. 4.Today, when the matter is called, the receipt has been filed. In view of the statement made by the parties and the joint compromise memo filed by them, no fruitful purpose will be achieved to proceed further in this matter.

5.In view of that, this petition is allowed and the entire proceedings in Crime No.60 of 2011 on the file of the 1st respondent police, is quashed against the petitioners. The joint compromise memo shall form part of the record. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (T&P) /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Dindigul, Dindigul District.

2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High court, Madurai.

+1 CC to Mr.C.K.M.APPAJI, Advocate, SR No.79599 Crl.O.P.(MD) No.13815 of 2013 02.12.2016 er SH/GSV-SV:11.01.2017:2P/4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/