Maharajan v. The Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 08/11/2023 PRESENT The Hon'ble Mr.Justice G.ILANGOVAN 1.Maharajan 2.Alagupillai ... Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 & 2 Vs The State, represented by The Inspector of Police, Natham Police Station, Dindigul District.
Crime No.576 of 2023.
... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.B.Jameelarasu, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.R.Suresh Kumar, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.576 of 2023 on the file of the Respondent police.
ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioners/Accused Nos.1 and 2, apprehending arrest at the hands of the 1/4
respondent Police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 324, 355, 354(A), 506(ii) I.P.C., in Crime No.576 of 2023 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that due to civil dispute between the petitioners' family and the family of the defacto complainant, the petitioners attacked the defacto complainant, caused injuries to him and also criminally intimidated him with dire consequences. Hence, the complaint.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in this case.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondent police submitted that injured has been discharged from the hospital and no previous case is pending against the petitioners.
5. Considering the nature of offence, the injured has been discharged from the hospital and no previous case is pending against the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 2/4
6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed and the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Natham, Dindigul District, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and the petitioners shall appear before the respondent Police daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.
7. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 08/11/2023 / TRUE COPY / /11/2023 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
INDU TO THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NATHAM, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.
3/4
DO THROUGH:
THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE NATHAM POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.
THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
+1 CC to M/s.B.JAMEEL ARASU, Advocate ( SR-16097[I] dated 09/11/2023 )
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.20131 of 2023 Date :08/11/2023 PKP/JGB/SAR- /20.11.2023/ 4P/ 6C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023 4/4